It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
news.yahoo.com...
Havana (AFP) - A Russian intelligence warship docked in Havana on Tuesday, a day before the start of historic US-Cuba talks aimed at normalizing diplomatic relations.
There was nothing stealthy about the arrival of the Viktor Leonov CCB-175, which was moored to a pier in Old Havana where cruise ships often dock. But the visit was not officially announced by Cuban authorities.
US officials in Washington played down the presence of the Russian vessel, saying it was perfectly legal and not at all out of the ordinary.
"It's not unprecedented. It's not unusual. It's not alarming," a defense official told AFP.
originally posted by: JiggyPotamus
I personally believe that IF listening devices were going to be installed the presence of a Russian naval vessel would have nothing to do with such a task. It would be done by an agent on the inside, and I'm sure there are multiple non-official cover operatives present, or undercover spies, as opposed to officially-sanctioned embassy spies. All nations know that any nation with an embassy in their country will have spies working there. It goes with the territory, but I don't know if they would task such an agent with installing listening devices. Russia has a strange-looking embassy building in Havana. I think that the presence of the Russian ship, if it was planned because of these talks, was meant to send a message that Russia is paying close attention. But the ship can legally be there, so there might be nothing strange going on at all. If there is something going on though, I do not think it would have to do with infiltrating the talks, either directly or indirectly. It would be too conspicuous, and that is a bad way to perform espionage.
Why would they be so blatant about it?
originally posted by: thesmokingman
originally posted by: JiggyPotamus
I agree, the US is far superior to any other countries intelligence agency for sure.
I think Mossad would give them a run for their money. And don't be too dismissive of the modern day KGB. And of course the UK has MI6 and of course most famously James Bond 007
originally posted by: Expat888
The usual game of spy vs. spy just like the old cold war days ..
Besides the russian ship captain had to give the crew something to keep occupied while he went ashore to get cigars .. otherwise theyd have all gone to the local bars to drink and sing russian songs ...
originally posted by: Wirral Bagpuss
originally posted by: thesmokingman
originally posted by: JiggyPotamus
I agree, the US is far superior to any other countries intelligence agency for sure.
I think Mossad would give them a run for their money. And don't be too dismissive of the modern day KGB. And of course the UK has MI6 and of course most famously James Bond 007
Fun fact
MI6 is not actually called that but SIS
And yeahthey would give the CIA a run for its money which is why the CIA use them alot lol
Also helps GCHQ and NSA are joined at the hip so basicaly useing the same signal and comms resources.
originally posted by: Expat888
The usual game of spy vs. spy just like the old cold war days ..
Besides the russian ship captain had to give the crew something to keep occupied while he went ashore to get cigars .. otherwise theyd have all gone to the local bars to drink and sing russian songs ...
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: thesmokingman
Why would they be so blatant about it?
Mainly it is them saying to those involved...we are going to listen to your meetings and there is nothing you can do about it.
Pretty much the way they have been doing things lately it seems.