It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tinner07
I work in the construction trade and we probably get paid better than the cops.
Maybe it would be better to say 10 law breaking thugs die instead of 1 LEO.
You say 320 people killed by LEO in 2013 and 34 LEO killed. We are a nation of 300 million so 320 is like what? 1% or .1
Of 320 killed how many were productive members of society?
Of the 34 Officers killed how many of those were productive members of society? I guess all of them.
Personally I would rather have a cop as a neighbor than some law breaking thug that is going to find his demise at the end of a gun barrell....
Wouldn't you?
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
Maybe the police of a large city, say chicago, should not show up to work for one week.
We should know by the end of that week if the cops do more harm than good.
originally posted by: theyknowwhoyouare
Although I get the sentiment groups of vigilantes "keeping the peace" will be far worse. There would be a lot of gang wars and such
originally posted by: NthOther
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
Maybe the police of a large city, say chicago, should not show up to work for one week.
We should know by the end of that week if the cops do more harm than good.
In that week, we'll see a more equitable distribution of resources than Chicago has ever seen.
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
"Looting".
originally posted by: lonesomerimbaud
a reply to: theyknowwhoyouare
Better the lives of zero cops and zero innocents.
Life is not cheap!
originally posted by: tinner07
You say 320 people killed by LEO in 2013 and 34 LEO killed. We are a nation of 300 million so 320 is like what? 1% or .1
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Even the anti-Cop brigade I think will disagree with you OP...
& rightly so.
Unbelievable day on ATS so far.
originally posted by: rickymouse
Sure, an occasional innocent individual will die
First, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant was under a legal duty to act in a particular fashion. Second, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant breached this duty by failing to conform his or her behavior accordingly. Third, the plaintiff must prove that he suffered injury or loss as a direct result of the defendant's breach.
In a world of billions, all it takes is the death of one person close to you for that world to disintegrate.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Pensioners?
Rape victims?
Child abuse victims?
Domestic abuse victims?
A whole host of others?
Perhaps...
originally posted by: NthOther
Cops don't prevent any of that from happening. They simply go after the people they think are responsible and bring them to some warped sense of what people call "justice".
Well, anyone can do that. And far more efficiently, I might add. Just because it's state-sanctioned doesn't mean it's a superior (or more legitimate) way of getting things done.
Again, it's mob rule any way you look at it. I'll take my chances with the people who aren't getting a paycheck to keep others "in line" with a gun.