It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RickinVa
2. What can be done technology wise to mitigate the problem?
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: RickinVa
Build a concrete hemisphere in four pieces/wedges, north south east and west of the facility atop transports like the ones used to move the Saturn 5 rockets, then push them in to place. Then mine under the facility but above the water table and pour vast amounts of concrete to prevent any core material leakage into the groundwater and soil. If we can build the Hoover dam more than 1/2 a century ago we can achieve a project such as the above.
All that's required on Humanity's part is materials and effort not to mention rather a few lives lost due to radioactive exposure I imagine.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: RickinVa
I was pondering this thought when i made a new thread in skunk works called ungrounded rain. It is a kinda silly thought to some but it is worth a shot imo. at the least what i purpose there has never been tried thereby never debunked but the thought is that simple rain water that has not touched the ground could reverse damaged soil if the soil and water are combined without being grounded to earth.
originally posted by: Thurisaz
a reply to: RickinVa
gee that is really strange: the media in Australia has reported the issue is fixed.
?
originally posted by: hololeap
How about we let Japan continue to beat out the fire for the next few thousand years and meanwhile the rest of the world can take it upon itself to dismantle the 434 other nuclear timebombs left on the planet. I hope the Fukushima disaster will open peoples' eyes to the uncontrollable dangers of nuclear power.
Back to ideas... if you were to completely surround one of the molten cores with borax, would that be enough to contain it? There would be the release of gasses as the heavy elements broke down, but would it at least be enough to keep the mass from going critical without the need of a constant flow of water?
originally posted by: hololeap
a reply to: Psynic
The details would obviously need to be worked out, but if this were to work, it would be a lot more obtainable than some of the other ideas posted here.