It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Forest Service says media needs photography permit in wilderness areas, alarming First Amendment adv

page: 3
32
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 26 2014 @ 08:25 AM
link   
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

Johnny, you're my ear to the ground in the Great White North. Thanks, I always read your posts.




posted on Sep, 26 2014 @ 08:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

Johnny, you're my ear to the ground in the Great White North. Thanks, I always read your posts.

Well, thank you! Just so's you know, that CBC thing is a comedy piece, eh?



posted on Sep, 26 2014 @ 08:40 AM
link   
Oooo...the dreaded double post!
edit on 26-9-2014 by JohnnyCanuck because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2014 @ 08:58 AM
link   
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

No really officer... I didn't see the bear, honestly.
I was bent down tying my shoe at the time and didn't see anything.



posted on Sep, 26 2014 @ 07:39 PM
link   
I think anyone should be allowed to film in a public place, and I believe that a national park or forest is considered "public," considering WE own it. Obviously areas that are restricted for national security purposes, such as military bases and the like, would not be considered a public place since civilians cannot go there at will, but they can go to a park or forest...In that regard I do believe this is absurd.



posted on Sep, 27 2014 @ 09:48 AM
link   
National parks aren't a public place...they are private land owned and operated by the US Gov.

a reply to: JiggyPotamus




top topics
 
32
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join