originally posted by: Starbucks
"it has been shown that HNS did not contribute mtDNA to HSS which indicates that it was HNS males mating with HSS females"
very good of you you said that.
then the maternal dna of the neanderthal is the maternal dna of current humans!
No, not at all. The mtDNA of HNS is from HNS, not HSS or HS. HNS were in Europe a 1/4 million years ago, what part of that are you not grasping? They
were there long before us and nowhere near your fantasy island time frames
then it is 100 % that of current humans not 3%.
even if we agreed they found nuclear dna in neanderthal bones which is hardly believable, the nuclear dna is just a drop in basin compared to amount
and availability of maternal dna, so they found 1% of the dna is nuclear dna and the rest is maternal dna, so which of the 3% of neanderthal dna is
found in humans currently living?
I give you change to chose any lie you want.
I'm good with the truth, you are the one making things up, which is essentially a lie, and not supporting or citing any statements. You're just
making up numbers, I've supplied citations all throughout my responses that support my statements, you simp,y choose not to believe the most current
data and models. If you wish to remain in the bliss of ignorance that's on you.
all humans have neanderthal dna 1 to 4% of their dna including all africans minus the Khoisan (barely half a million out a billion
No, as I showed above with quotes and citations, that is not the case. Show me evidence of African populations with HNS DNA and I will admit I am in
so how did the Neanderthal have sex with all homosapien women even those in africa which neanderthal did not visit?
They didn't have to. There is plenty of migrational data, again supplied previously by myself, that shows that some of the Africans who left for
Europe had returned to Africa more in more than one migration over at least the past 3000 years. But it's a moot point as there is currently no
evidence or data to show that HNS genes are in ANY Africans.
the african homosapiens who left africa are called the out of africa humans, they can not include the africans of african maternal and paternal
ancestry who never left africa other wise they would have left their signature outside africa.
Yes, and they did as some of the returned. The ONLY Africans who never left were the Khoisan
the dna does not lie it is much precise than thumbprints. If DNA decided that you and another person is father and a son then it is
Precisely, yet you are ignoring the copious amounts of data, both in the genetic and fossil records that prove the exact opposite of what you are
the maternal dna of african never left africa, the ones who left are known as the out of africa like L3, M, N < R etc, while L1, L2, L3 never
also male ancestry haplogroup A and B and most E never left africa.
Since you refuse to support any of these assertions we should all just take your word for it I guess
also humans of out of africa have dna similarity to africa humans 87% while they only differ by 12% (so all humans out of africa combined (6
billions ) only differ by 12% which translates that all of them were together in africa untill recent time (between 10k and 40k)
even though homosapiens branched from that one man (50 to 200k years ago) still they only left recently (by DNA evidence which beats any other bone
reading and looking at).
No, all that is evidence for is the genetic bottleneck that reduced HSS to a population of approximately 10,000 after the Toba event 70,000 BPE
so the conclusion the 3% of neanderthal dna found in current humans is because the neanderthal were homosapiens, descendent of the same Most
Recent common ancestor of current humans (aka the homosapiens). in a nutshel, the neanderthal were homosapiens and also came from the same man, and
not from any other man, because of the existance of neanderthal dna in all current humans (which is actually current human dna found in neanderthals
who were fully homosapiens and descendents of the same MRCA.
the fossil looking at and imagining things and bla bla dating according to bla bla is wrong because it differ with dna evidence so they all thrown in
the garbage bin.
The only thing in the garbage bin is the incorrect information you continue to disseminate and refuse to support with evidence or citations.