It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RationalHuman
He could easily have violated Iraq's sovereignty and kept troops there, it's not like the US has never done that before.
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
I'd like to add a small observation, if I may.....
Bush started this mess, Indeed. No question. Most of us were there to see it, and many of us were in eager support at the time. I was one of those people. Bush and Co. managed to pull one over on a good part of the Government, as well as the population. He got his war and the Bush family got their settlement on the Saddam issue, open from 1991.
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
a reply to: Logarock
I think that is a prediction a number of people turned out to be right on...and I'll wager every one of them would give anything to have been dead wrong on that one.
I fear our nation has been at war too long to have perspective at this point. We don't even see war as an All or Nothing proposition anymore. Not on any level. It's fine to pop in for a contingency operation, kill a bunch of folks while hoping the right ones were the majority, then pop back out to return to other concerns. How tidy it seems from this end...and how bloody and endless it seems where we do our pop-in/out acts.
Hell...Hindsight is 20/20 and hindsight will have us looking backward as we walk right into a pole and knock ourselves out cold.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: angeldoll
I believe it's been said multiple times that the US would only stay in Iraq with the provision of certain conditions. Those conditions were not met.
Can you post those "conditions" ?
Might be some relevance.
October 2011 decision to withdraw all American forces[edit]
As reported on Saturday, October 15, 2011, the Obama Administration proceeded with the plan to withdraw American forces from Iraq (barring some last-minute move in the Iraqi parliament when they returned from a break in late November 2011 shortly before the end-of-the-year withdrawal date) because of concerns that they would not have be given immunity from Iraqi courts, a concern for American commanders in the field who also had to worry about the Sadrist response should troops stay and the general state of Iraq's readiness for transfer of power.
originally posted by: shrevegalBush/Obama...makes no difference...the damage has been done while either/or has been in office.
originally posted by: JacKatMtn
Let's stop this blame game... realize our gov't is broke, and fix it...
The blame game is OLD.....
It wasn't Obama's decision to get out of Iraq, but he can take credit for making it happen.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: angeldoll
I believe it's been said multiple times that the US would only stay in Iraq with the provision of certain conditions. Those conditions were not met.
Can you post those "conditions" ?
Might be some relevance.
originally posted by: tsingtao
originally posted by: amazing
Non-Issue. We needed to get out of there. The failings are with the government of Iraq. We put in a week government that alienated half the population. To blame Obama in any way for the Iraq mess is laughable. Only a fool would do that.
we did and look what happens.
he is blameing bush, AGAIN! lol.
obama has had more time with maliki than bush.
4 yrs of hillary in the mid-east, no surprise IS sprung up.
originally posted by: xuenchen
If Bush hadn't "started" the war(s) in Iraq,
what would be the state of affairs now?