It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: [post=18126383]olaru12
dbl....edit on 9-7-2014 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)
prove it. This opens the door to every tax paying fiction, including you and i. It was ruled the aca is a tax (actually it cannot be, according to Justice Roberts brief on the decision. This bill originated in the senate. All taxes MUST originate in The House. It should have simply been sentback to the house but after the decision they were running out of time so they said "ok, we will call the aca a tax now. So lets sign it.) So any corporate fiction will have to be extended these same "rights" and exemptions in the end. If it is truly a tax, the aca that is. This is all corporate law in admiralty courts making decisions on commerce. No common law pleas
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Annee
Yep. It also seems to me that SCOTUS has also disenfranchised other's religious beliefs, who also may own closely held corporations, by ruling the "religious" objection only extends to the contraception mandate and excludes, say, a Scientologist business owner who wants to refuse to pay for depression medication.
i own a business. I produce food. No matter any court ruling, i would still help feed you. To me, that's common sense
originally posted by: olaru12
As an owner of 3 business perhaps I can claim religious affiliation and aversion to FOOLS.
I can think of a few ATS members that I'd send on their way; especially when they start their religious hyperbolic rants.
Also it would be nice not to have to do business with those that have let their ideology get in the way of their common sense.
originally posted by: manna2
i own a business. I produce food. No matter any court ruling, i would still help feed you. To me, that's common sense
originally posted by: olaru12
As an owner of 3 business perhaps I can claim religious affiliation and aversion to FOOLS.
I can think of a few ATS members that I'd send on their way; especially when they start their religious hyperbolic rants.
Also it would be nice not to have to do business with those that have let their ideology get in the way of their common sense.
originally posted by: manna2
prove it. This opens the door to every tax paying fiction, including you and i. It was ruled the aca is a tax (actually it cannot be, according to Justice Roberts brief on the decision. This bill originated in the senate. All taxes MUST originate in The House. It should have simply been sentback to the house but after the decision they were running out of time so they said "ok, we will call the aca a tax now. So lets sign it.) So any corporate fiction will have to be extended these same "rights" and exemptions in the end. If it is truly a tax, the aca that is. This is all corporate law in admiralty courts making decisions on commerce. No common law pleas
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Annee
Yep. It also seems to me that SCOTUS has also disenfranchised other's religious beliefs, who also may own closely held corporations, by ruling the "religious" objection only extends to the contraception mandate and excludes, say, a Scientologist business owner who wants to refuse to pay for depression medication.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: NavyDoc
Look. we both disagree with SCOTUS rulings and certain laws. It doesn't matter that we do. If you want to debate those concepts, make another thread. I won't debate contraception methods with you in this thread. It's off topic.
The fact that Hobby Lobby owner is a fundie dominionist is not.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: NavyDoc
LOL. Ironic post is ironic. It's amusing how leftists fight hate and intolerance by being hateful and intolerant.
LOL. I find it hilarious that "Rightists" spend so much time convincing themselves that others are persecuting them that they lose their ability to distinguish Humor from Hate Speech.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: NavyDoc
This ruling has, in fact, violated 1000's of women's 14th Amendment rights of Equal Protection, albeit temporarily. Hence the governmental scrambling.
This IS a ridiculous ruling.
Hobby Lobby provides health insurance. They, of course, pay for Viagra, and even said they pay for sterilization. Which, I am going to assume, means vasectomies. I have doubts they mean sterilization of women.
They do pay for some forms of birth control, but have selected a few they "believe" causes abortion, even though science says that's false.
So, because the owner of this company simply BELIEVES something, he has the right to deny his female employees AND their doctor.
And, as previously stated, he has no problem buying from companies that not only promote abortion, but sometimes force it.
This is NOT about being denied "free stuff".
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: manna2
i own a business. I produce food. No matter any court ruling, i would still help feed you. To me, that's common sense
originally posted by: olaru12
As an owner of 3 business perhaps I can claim religious affiliation and aversion to FOOLS.
I can think of a few ATS members that I'd send on their way; especially when they start their religious hyperbolic rants.
Also it would be nice not to have to do business with those that have let their ideology get in the way of their common sense.
No thanks....
I have been following this thread and your posts...
Your obvious hatred of anything liberal, progressive or outside of your theological box would cause me to expect it might be tainted. I'll just mosey on down to the 7/11 and purchase a slim jim and a 6 of Tecate. So far 7/11 hasn't shown a propensity to discriminate against women or people of color.
To be perfectly honest; I have a very hard time trusting or believing anyone with discriminatory agenda.
originally posted by: olaru12
As an owner of 3 business perhaps I can claim religious affiliation and aversion to FOOLS.
I can think of a few ATS members that I'd send on their way; especially when they start their religious hyperbolic rants.
Also it would be nice not to have to do business with those that have let their ideology get in the way of their common sense.
You claim that the rights of women were violated. The answer is no, their rights were not violated.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: NavyDoc
You claim that the rights of women were violated. The answer is no, their rights were not violated.
The only reason that you're saying that is because you disagree with the SCOTUS decision. The HL ruling squarely places the burden of giving these disenfranchised women the "free stuff ", that the law says they're entitled to, onto the government, Title X and that tax payer.
Unfortunately, the funding and infrastructure for these women's services and medicines is not yet in place. Until they are in place, regardless of your opinion of the validity of their legal access to these things, they're 14th Amendment rights are being violated. Not because I say so, because the "law" says so.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: diggindirt
We're on page 24. You're late.
Arrogant smugness has already been covered.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
LOL. That's laughable because the PC police and all of the ranting about hate speech is a lefty phenomenon. When a conservative tells a joke, it's hate speech, racism, intolerance, homophobia, sexism. When a leftist does it, it's "satire."
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: olaru12
As an owner of 3 business perhaps I can claim religious affiliation and aversion to FOOLS.
I can think of a few ATS members that I'd send on their way; especially when they start their religious hyperbolic rants.
Also it would be nice not to have to do business with those that have let their ideology get in the way of their common sense.
And as a business owner you should have the right to refuse service to anyone you wish. Freedom of association. The question is, would you permit that right to other business owners?
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: NavyDoc
LOL. That's laughable because the PC police and all of the ranting about hate speech is a lefty phenomenon. When a conservative tells a joke, it's hate speech, racism, intolerance, homophobia, sexism. When a leftist does it, it's "satire."
Yep that's right. We're persecuting you again, aren't we?!?!? Now with are Satire.
"Oh lord, when will this persecution end??? Why won't the Demon Possessed Progressives just let all us Saintly Right Wing Christian Business Owners simply run our Gay Bashing, Self-Righteous, Theocratic for profit businesses in Peace??? Why can't we just be left alone so that we can shove our Religious Rules in their faces without their consent??? I mean all we're trying to do as Warriors for Christ is show people what evil sinners they are and expose their sins before our Loving God sends them into Hell forever. It's the Constitutional Right of every Capitalistic Christian Soldier to Demonize the Poor for their leeching off the Government Dime while while cheating on our taxes with Corporate Loopholes and Government Subsidies!!! Our white skinned, middle eastern born savior said we'd be hated during these End Times for nothing other than just being our Pure, Loving Christian selves!!!"
How's that for satire??? Now you don't need to cry about it any more because I've done it all for you.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: olaru12
As an owner of 3 business perhaps I can claim religious affiliation and aversion to FOOLS.
I can think of a few ATS members that I'd send on their way; especially when they start their religious hyperbolic rants.
Also it would be nice not to have to do business with those that have let their ideology get in the way of their common sense.
And as a business owner you should have the right to refuse service to anyone you wish. Freedom of association. The question is, would you permit that right to other business owners?
How in the holy hell can I have any influence of what other business owners do or chose to be their customers.
It's the SCOTUS that has taken the corporate personhood to an obscene level. Not me.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: olaru12
As an owner of 3 business perhaps I can claim religious affiliation and aversion to FOOLS.
I can think of a few ATS members that I'd send on their way; especially when they start their religious hyperbolic rants.
Also it would be nice not to have to do business with those that have let their ideology get in the way of their common sense.
And as a business owner you should have the right to refuse service to anyone you wish. Freedom of association. The question is, would you permit that right to other business owners?
How in the holy hell can I have any influence of what other business owners do or chose to be their customers.
It's the SCOTUS that has taken the corporate personhood to an obscene level. Not me.
Really? Would you vote for or against various anti discrimination laws? Do you support or not support politicians who would tell your fellow business owners what to do or not to do?
Certainly you effect what your other business owners do every time you step inside that voting booth.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: olaru12
As an owner of 3 business perhaps I can claim religious affiliation and aversion to FOOLS.
I can think of a few ATS members that I'd send on their way; especially when they start their religious hyperbolic rants.
Also it would be nice not to have to do business with those that have let their ideology get in the way of their common sense.
And as a business owner you should have the right to refuse service to anyone you wish. Freedom of association. The question is, would you permit that right to other business owners?
How in the holy hell can I have any influence of what other business owners do or chose to be their customers.
It's the SCOTUS that has taken the corporate personhood to an obscene level. Not me.
Really? Would you vote for or against various anti discrimination laws? Do you support or not support politicians who would tell your fellow business owners what to do or not to do?
Certainly you effect what your other business owners do every time you step inside that voting booth.
I would vote against any laws that restrict free enterprise. However I realize that voting is pure BS and only works on the micro local level. I still vote in all elections and work for my Libertarian party at every opportunity. I still have no illusions that fascism is right around the corner all wrapped in the flag holding a Bible. TY S. Lewis.