It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AnIntellectualRedneck
...
The extreme and aggressive anti-union activities of Wal-mart is borderline illegal in many cases as well. If their conditions and pay are so great, why are they so dogged and furiously against being unionized? I mean, there are many examples in the industry of stores being unionized and still very profitable. Kroger and Publix are just two off the top of my head.
originally posted by: rickymouse
You know what we really should have a thread on....selection. Why do these big stores need three brands of milk, four types of each brand, plus all the soy milks and rice milks and organic milks. Each brand means more milk going back that wasn't purchased. It means more coolers. Three to four brands of cottage cheese, both in regular and reduced fat...why not just one good brand of this. We wonder how come the prices keep creeping up, it costs money to stock a store with stuff that doesn't turn over. I'm not going to even start on cereals. Flours are different, different brands have different properties and some recipes require certain brands.
I think people's demands for products is getting outrageous. People want stores to stock everything.
I must be getting old, I remember when there were only about eight types of cereal in a store. Cheerios, Corn flakes, Rice Crispies, frosted flakes, Shredded wheat, and fruit loops were most of them. When I go there now...I get overwhelmed by the choices. Some cereals they tote as healthy can break your teeth. How healthy is that? I bet the dental association is the main investor in those cereals. I lied, I started on cereals.
originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe
I read your posts and I must say that if you hadn't mentioned it, no one would have ever guessed that you didn't have a HSD, you are wise beyond whats on paper.
Unions are dirty criminal orginizations for the most part, their thug tactics aren't much removed from their mafia days. They want a cut of the pie.
As you say in the next sentence, this was not a serious comment. Yes, we have laws against monopolies. No, Walmart is not a monopoly.
There used to be laws against monopolies here in the US, but I guess wallyworld has no monopoly, we still have Amazon!
What in the world is g146541 saying? "If this reporter was in fact a journalist." Why was the "if" put in? Is g146541 going to argue that he wasn't a journalist? Fine then, let's see his argument.
I do not know who the writer is who wrote the walmart "hit piece" or if he has a reputation to keep up.
My guess being a journalist nowadays, maybe not. we have readers, not reporters anymore for the greatest part. . . . If this reporter was in fact a journalist, why did he not dig into the real dirt surrounding Walmart and find the real bodies??
Look at the assumptions. Walmart needs publicity? Walmart?? I wish g146541 would present any serious analysis saying that Walmart's problems are the result of insufficient publicity and that more publicity will solve it. It's just not true.
Walmart profits are down and they need some publicity, Someone sets up an easily refutable article in a MAJOR paper.
People eating it up? The only place I can find the story in anywhere near a mainstream source is FOX online. G146541's claim is that Walmart was hoping for masses of free publicity from the mainstream media, who would cover Walmart's attack on a Times reporter. That idea makes no sense whatsoever. Of course it's not being covered. Of course, Walmart isn't getting mountains of free publicity. Of course, that part of the conspiracy theory is too far-fetched for serious belief. (By the way, it wasn't the CEO. Small point.)
CEO comes along and sprinkles sunshine and rainbows on the bad dark article and makes it sparkle!
Public being addicted to remote conflict as evidenced by the sheer mass number of "reality shows", eats up the counter hit piece and says, "What a great bunch of guys that Walmart is"!!!
That's a vague, meaningless kind of smear. G146541 should show us where it has been proved that several politicians have taken bribes from Walmart to do illegal things about new store sites. (it would be nice if they were American politicians, by the way, for several reasons including culture, legal systems, etc.
For instance where Walmart pays off politicians to ...umm... "expedite" new store sites..
Walmart profits are down and they need some publicity, Someone sets up an easily refutable article in a MAJOR paper.
There we go. Game over, g146541 becomes an unapologetic fan of Walmart.
Someone sets up an easily refutable article in a MAJOR paper.
So, apparently, g146541 believes that corporations are persons, because they can be evil. (I'm beginning to wonder about g146541. He keeps taking pro-corporate positions.)
Walmart is not evil
Aaaaand, you lost me right there!!
Here, g146541 leaves normal conversation behind to engage in what seems to be angry hyperbole. No first grader knows what a corporation is, of course, and their sense of morality rarely goes beyond "Naughty and Nice."
A child entering the first grade can see that ANY and EVERY corporation at the heart HAS to be a psychopathic, sociopathic entity to survive, the truly evil ones THRIVE.
What? How about this one?
Are you trying to tell me the quality of life is up from 20-30 years ago here in the US???
Now go ahead and tell me how benevolent corporations are...
that sounds a lot like "I'm upset with Walmart because they're doing what everyone else is doing."
My personal issue with Walmart is that these days (within the past few years), they've adopted the now common practice . . .
originally posted by: charles1952
A few more responses, as you deserve them for the effort you've put in.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Sorry, I don't get your point at all. When you say that most of the military is not educated, do you mean that most of the military does not have a college degree?
You must, since members of the military are much more likely to have at least a High School Diploma or GED than the average American.
www.civmilblog.com...
And does Walmart have many "College necessary jobs?" I know employers ask for college degrees, but they are rarely necessary unless one is looking for a professional career, or work in one of the sciences.
Anyway, I don't understand what you're trying to say.
---------------------
...
You're upset that a person is hired for $12 an hour, works 40 hours a week and gets paid $12 an hour?
Sure, the pay rate may average $12 an hour, but when you're only getting 20 hours a week, you're still going to be forced to have another job, etc. And that other job will also be part time, so even though you work over 40 hours a week, no benefits for you.
Actually, they could have worked you 80 hours. Either way, you'd be eligible for benefits twice over. Uhhh? Are you saying that $12 an hour is slave wage? Really? Do you live in the United States? Back in 2010, 45% of Americans over 15 had incomes under $25,000 a year. ($12.50 an hour, full time)
Best of all, between the 2 companies they can work you 79 hours a week for the slave wage and NEVER have to pay out any overtime!
If by unfortunate coincidence, you mean the election of our president in 2008 and 2012, I couldn't agree more. But you have absolutely nothing but an underhanded assertion that the corporations did this. I am anxious to see what proof you have for that statement. No, wait. I'm not anxious to see your "proof," just as I am not anxious to see the tooth fairy. Neither exists.
I don't think corporations would have engineered this intentionally, it must just be an unfortunate coincidence, right?
Really? At 20 hours a week, and $12 an hour, a single person meets the income requirements for Medicaid in just about every state in the country. (At 11.50 an hour, it is every state in the country.) If you qualify for Medicaid, there is no mandatory health care payment. What are you talking about?
Gotta have that second job to pay the MANDATORY health care.