It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Destinyone
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
One would think a vote like this...none of the above, would shake a few career politicians heads up.
But knowing Harry, all he'll do is throw more money at it. It's the only way they know. Buy votes when they can't get them on their records.
When the Cantor vote was being tallied, he was no where around, couldn't be found by his campaign people, for them to tell him things were not looking so good. He was already out with donors pre-celebrating his big win. That's how sure he was he was going to win. I loved seeing that butt hurt look on his face when he found out he'd lost.
I want to see that same look on every good old boy, look out for each other only, career politician.
It's time we the people, take back our Country. Both parties need to clean house.
Des
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: FarleyWayne
I think any ballot paper which does not include an option for "none of the above" is not a proper ballot paper. Well done to everyone who voted for the only logical choice on the sheet!
This actually applies to ALL elections. We are not stupid and we do know that it really doesn't matter which party is voted for or gets in, they are all controlled by the same people, hence the historically consistent "working against the majority of constituents" problem. I can't find one person, and I know thousands, who actually believes elections are not rigged in one way or another, either by vote count or by choice in available candidates.
Could you please enforce a candidate option that states "None of the Above" as a final option on the form. The candidates rolled out are generally either nepotistic, useless, corrupt or simply stupid and they all have the distinct appearance of either being narcissistic sociopaths or psychopaths with a "screw everyone else and let's see what I can do for me today" attitude.
It would be a nice option and an effective way for people to show their acceptance, acquiescence or disgust in the system and the candidates.
It might also be an interesting additional option, in gathering data, to place a series of three or four check-boxes after each candidate's name, where the voter could agree easily with "honest", "lazy", "moron" or "corrupt."
This was hopefully some helpful thoughts and suggestions on the skewed nature of our faux political system in this colony.
originally posted by: lindalinda
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: FarleyWayne
I think any ballot paper which does not include an option for "none of the above" is not a proper ballot paper. Well done to everyone who voted for the only logical choice on the sheet!
Really? I think None of the Above is pretty silly, because they won't let "nobody" win. We always have the option of not entering a choice for a particular race. Or skipping voting altogether.
originally posted by: Destinyone
originally posted by: lindalinda
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: FarleyWayne
I think any ballot paper which does not include an option for "none of the above" is not a proper ballot paper. Well done to everyone who voted for the only logical choice on the sheet!
Really? I think None of the Above is pretty silly, because they won't let "nobody" win. We always have the option of not entering a choice for a particular race. Or skipping voting altogether.
I disagree. By have the option of marking none of the above. You are making a statement, that those running for office, do NOT meet your standards. It's also a wake up call to those running, that they didn't campaign on what *we the people* wanted.
Des
originally posted by: one4all
sweet.
Now you are all finally seeing how you have been led down the Garden Path for so long.
NO ONE VOTES.
If 100% of Americans voted there would be little to no corruption in their Country because there are far more good Americans than bad ones,it is that simple.
A 100% vote enforced by law is all you need.
Thanks to a 1975 state law, Nevadans have the option to cast a vote for "none of these candidates." And on Tuesday, that's what Democratic voters did, voting for no one nearly 22,000 times. "None of these candidates" took 30 percent of the vote and finished first.
In primary campaigns since 1998, Democrats have voted for "none of these candidates" at higher rates than Republicans, according to data from the U.S. Election Atlas. Over 120,000 votes have been cast for no one in eight races on the Democratic side, with "None" having and average finish of 2.5 (in other words, somewhere between second and third). "None" kept doing better in gubernatorial primaries, too: third in 2006 and second in 2010. In all primaries, "None" scooped up 15.6 percent of the vote, on average.
originally posted by: TomLawless
How would a government go about forcing people to vote? Go door to door with guns?