It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You can pick any two candles, light them, and chances are pretty good that one will burn more brightly than the other, for random reasons. If there's any difference at all the chances are 50% that the one in your test will be brighter than the control. So these are totally unscientific odds for proving anything.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Time can be removed to facilitate anti gravity, warp drives. This is basically what I gather out of this video
originally posted by: NorEaster
What seems increasingly clear is that no one has bothered to ask the obvious question "What is the physical nature of space-time?", and have simply let the math lead them around as if it (on its own) can make planets and stars and galaxies behave as they do.
mbkennel
What's the difference? The physical nature of space time is what it does, and the math says exactly how much.
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: mbkennel
What's the difference? The physical nature of space time is what it does, and the math says exactly how much.
Why muddy a perfectly good 17th century discussion with such things as reality and math?
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Einstein was working to someone's agenda. he was maybe told to generate a status quo in msm that will last perpetually. So he came up with his GR a thought exercise. Yes he must have concurrently picked up a lot of ideas from others during his tenure at the swiss patent office.
a reply to: NorEaster
Lol a tactical retreat from something that ought not to be discussed. Oh gosh now I get it finally.
originally posted by: bbracken677
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Einstein was working to someone's agenda. he was maybe told to generate a status quo in msm that will last perpetually. So he came up with his GR a thought exercise. Yes he must have concurrently picked up a lot of ideas from others during his tenure at the swiss patent office.
a reply to: NorEaster
LOL seriously?
I am done with this discussion. This is ludicrous.