posted on May, 16 2014 @ 12:53 AM
originally posted by: sourcecontroller
Against a potential rudimentary, but growing, ICBM threat from North Korea, Iran, and Iraq, a boost-phase system would destroy the missiles
during the firing of the second or third stage of a three-stage ICBM. Instead of an interval of 20 minutes or more during which the warhead is
coasting in space toward its target in the United States, a boost-phase intercept would need to be conducted within the 250-second burn time of an
ICBM.5 But that is possible.
I think it is pretty clear at this point. This is a tit for tat. So we can not use your cheap rockets for our missions then we show everyone how
unreliable they are. Just a crazy conspiracy theory I am sure, right?
yep and only 2 days after donald rumsfeld said he would audit the pentagon and see where 25% of there lost money went a "plane" Hit the room that held
the records ole rumsfeld was talking about killing all the civilian auditors..... just a crazy conspiracy... nothing to see here.
i wonder how they are doing it??
lets ponder on that one? laser? kinetic projectile? couldnt be an explosive i dont think, would be traceable and recognizable.
im voting smallllll but super super fast rail gun or possibly laser, the stuff I've seen lasers burn up takes a pretty long time so idk if i can
really think laser, il say if they got some top secret laser then laser but with current public tech it couldnt be a laser i dont think? could it?
a small (relative term) Rail gun projectile could get traveling at a very very great deal of speed if its made of the right material and fired from a
OOOOO i just had a thought.... and sorry i type like a constant stream of consciousness but I've found it to be the most effective way for me to get
ideas out, kinda jumpy sometimes but you can always bet its honest.
BUT YA that thought i had.
CHAMP, boeing EMP cruise missle.
i imagine a directed EMP burst would probably be pretty devastating to a rocket while its launching? are they emp shielded to be in space? probably
not the launch vehicle tho? its a thought i guess.
what do you guys think?
edit on 16-5-2014 by mindseye1609 because: (no reason given)