It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Again: The goal was not to orbit the moon, it was to LAND and RETURN from the moon.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: eriktheawful
Again: The goal was not to orbit the moon, it was to LAND and RETURN from the moon.
It is a very simple mission. Apollo 8. December 1968. 10 orbits around the moon with 1,2,3 human occupants. What is holding back other countries from doing this for 42 years?
Again: the Russians had all the pieces to the puzzle except the human rated space capsule that could take them outside the earth radiation belts.
Again: the Russians had all the pieces to the puzzle except the human rated space capsule that could take them outside the earth radiation belts.
The problem wasn't with taking them outside the radiation belts, it was chiefly with being able to get back to Earth without leaving a large smoking crater in the Russian steppe.
It would have been great propaganda for the USSR to send Valeria Tereshkova to the moon during the 1970's, the 1980's or the early 1990's.
The thing about the lunar missions is that a commitment has to be made early on in the development process; orbital rendezvous or a single vehicle. You can't change horses in midstream. The Soviets, like the US, committed to a single launch. The Saturn V worked, the N1 didn't.
Soviets had demonstrated capability in low earth orbit and never attempted going beyond.
Is it purely the extra weight of a manned version that would have meant the same booster set-up couldn't work for a manned flyby?
No. It would have been coming in second place. Not good propaganda for the expense. Why do you think the US quit doing it?
From 1978-1988, the Soviet Union, transported 11 citizens of 10 nations closely allied to the USSR in the Soyuz manned vehicle. All of them flew as a result of the Intercosmos program. These space travelers have usually been referred to as "cosmonauts".
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Rob48
Is it purely the extra weight of a manned version that would have meant the same booster set-up couldn't work for a manned flyby?
Turtles don't weigh much. Or drink much. Or breathe much. Probably didn't eat anything, for that matter.
Every kilogram of payload requires more fuel. Every kilogram of fuel requires...still more fuel.
Like I said the Soviets had mastered low earth orbit there is nothing holding them back from the moon........ are you saying the Russians are too stupid to engineer a space capsule that can humans can traverse the Van Allen Belts?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Rob48
Is it purely the extra weight of a manned version that would have meant the same booster set-up couldn't work for a manned flyby?
Turtles don't weigh much. Or drink much. Or breathe much. Probably didn't eat anything, for that matter.
Every kilogram of payload requires more fuel. Every kilogram of fuel requires...still more fuel.