Wow, this is just mind blowing to me and pretty great to see. This makes the Simulation Hypothesis from people like Nick Bostrom a very real
possibility. It's really just a matter of computing power because we will simulate the universe and consciousness. We could be nestled inside a
simulation or a multitude of simulated universes right now. Here's the article:
Astronomers have a pretty good idea how the universe began and the near-14 billion years of evolution after, but throwing all our knowledge behind
one grand computer simulation has been hard. The task at hand has simply too huge for any one computer to handle.
Today, however, astronomers have announced the results of three months of computer number-crunching, combining 8,000 CPUs all running in parallel,
modeling our evolving universe. If the same simulation was carried out on your office desktop computer, the simulation would take 2,000 years to
Previous work has either focused on a tiny portion of cosmic volume or had been too low a resolution. This study, however, has created a cube 350
million light-years across and over 13 billion years of simulated time at an unprecedented resolution. This work has been published in the May 8
edition of the journal Nature.
The most striking thing about this virtual universe is its uncanny resemblance to observations made by today’s observatories. The recreation of the
array of galaxies we see deep in the furthest-most reaches of the universe form in strikingly familiar shapes and sizes.
The model, called Illustris, created a 3-D space filled with 12 billion pixels, all calculating the fundamental equations that govern normal (and
dark) matter. The researchers can now zoom in on regions of interest to focus on different mechanisms as they unfold. When they kicked off the
simulation 12 million simulated years after the Big Bang, some 41,000 galaxies condensed into numerous galactic cluster from the seemingly chaotic
churning of matter.
I take issue with it because it's only a simulation based on the data people fed it, some they derived from theories. Much of that data could be
incorrect, so there is no telling how off that simulation is.
They say in the video that some things don't match up but as you can see from the video is still very close.. This is also why more simulations will
be created. Who knows, if we're in a simulation it could be a simulation that's slightly off. We would think it's the "right" simulation but that
could be subjective.
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.
All content copyright 2015, The Above Network, LLC.