It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did Elizabeth Warren just toss her hat in the 2016 ring?

page: 2
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 1 2014 @ 03:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: ScientiaFortisDefendit

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Boscov

And for me, just to be clear, HRC is not even imaginable. No way.

But the fact is that the middle class IS being ripped to shreds. Voting R across the board? Really??
sigh


By whom is the middle class being ripped to shreds, Buzzy? You still blaming Bush? Really??


It's rather easy to figure that out. Just look for the people that keep crying for tax cuts for the rich while blocking the middle class and poor getting a wage they can live on. People that vote across the board just because it's Democrat or Republican have no place in the voting booth because they do more harm than good.


I have quite literally never seen so much hypocrisy in one sentence. Not to mention off-topic. Since you need educating, it is the democratic leadership who are responsible. The prior administration can only be blamed for so long before it is obvious who is doing what.




posted on May, 1 2014 @ 10:37 PM
link   
a reply to: FlyersFan

>nitpicking



posted on May, 1 2014 @ 10:39 PM
link   
a reply to: beezzer

troll harder..



posted on May, 2 2014 @ 06:21 AM
link   
a reply to: NonsensicalUserName
Um .... no. It's not nitpicking to point out that the woman lied repeatedly about her ethnicity in order to get preferential status. Exposing lies isn't nitpicking and it's not a small matter to the Native American Indian population. Oh .. and her dodging questions about her legal license status isn't 'nitpicking' either. Nor is her backing big corporations against the people who they poisoned with asbestos.

nitpicking.... baaah ....



posted on May, 2 2014 @ 06:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: NonsensicalUserName
troll harder..


That's all you've got? A one line insult?
Beezzer made some legitimate points about Warrens agenda.
How about you give it a try and actually address them?



posted on May, 2 2014 @ 06:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: NonsensicalUserName
a reply to: beezzer

troll harder..



What qualities and policies do you see Warren bringing to the table then?



posted on May, 2 2014 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: FlyersFan

first off; those weren't all legitamate points; even those that had some truth to them weren't necessarily telling the whole story.

Example: "weakening our military" a bit of truth to this, defense spending hopefully will get cut down a bit; but so what we have a military that would still be larger than the rest of the worlds militaries.?

a reply to: beezzer

well she seems to actually know what she's talking about, and seems to be focused on reigning in the banks
youtu.be...
edit on 2-5-2014 by NonsensicalUserName because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-5-2014 by NonsensicalUserName because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2014 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: NonsensicalUserName

So you gave me a youtube vid to watch?

She seems to reign in the banks?

Does she want to end the Fed?



posted on May, 2 2014 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: beezzer

I don't think so; however I think she is in favor of reforming the federal reserve, or at the very least does not look too favorably at it or its recent policies.

Keep in mind removing the federal reserve altogether at present would be a very large undertaking..
edit on 2-5-2014 by NonsensicalUserName because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2014 @ 11:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Boscov

Please say YES!

Having a socialist run on the democrat ticket would make anyone else president!

(hoping for a libertarian candidate!)


Oh I'll welcome this fraud to get another chance at taking her apart on her claims of Native American blood. She thinks that's over and people dropped it because she cried bloody murder in phony indignation. Oh...Noo... Not even remotely CLOSE to over. If she wants to run for something above what she wormed her way into? Cool.... She has pre-constructed the very issue that will see her political destruction in something like the cage fighting of Presidential Politics.

Nothing could make me happier for the show to come in primaries than seeing this liar come to the national stage to try and explain it to the whole nation. ...and whatever she thinks? She *WILL* be explaining that shameful behavior of hers..Again and again and again and again.

She deeply DEEPLY offended a number of people, myself included, who will never forgive or forget it. It's a bell she can't un-ring, however much people make a living at the art of rewriting history and statements.
edit on 3-5-2014 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2014 @ 12:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Wrabbit2000

here is an article that kind of does some fact checking, thankfully it has links, so if you dislike "Washington Post Blogs" for whatever reason you can do you're own research

www.washingtonpost.com... -heritage/2012/09/27/d0b7f568-08a5-11e2-a10c-fa5a255a9258_blog.html

Eh so far its looking like all the candidates have dirty little secrets or critiques.



Rand Paul for instance kinda shot himself in the foot with his comments on hurricane sandy relief, amoung other things.

Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush are both considered too "establishment" or "dynastic"...

Jeb Bush also got in trouble for his partial defense or at the very least justification of illegal immigration.

And I guess when election time gets around the corner, and we finalize who the heck will run, we will see even more mudslinging of this sort.



posted on May, 4 2014 @ 04:46 AM
link   
a reply to: NonsensicalUserName

Every politician, without a single exception, anywhere in this nation has dirty secrets. Every last one.

However...I have a very special level of 0 tolerance for people so low class, they would lie about the very blood running within them for personal gain on the backs of others. In this case, on the backs of the most legitimately beaten down and oppressed people in our American history. Bar none.

So.. Unless one of them is a child molester or spiked the punch bowl at graduation of a Nunnery, they can't even come to hold a candle to the level Elizabeth Warren fell to in what she did there.

Really.. Politicians don't understand something. SOME of us really do have values. Some of them are absolutely non-negotiable, and represent lines nothing comes back from. She sure found one in this country, as I know I'm far from alone in the visceral reaction of pure disgust.



posted on May, 4 2014 @ 04:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Boscov

Yes, she is the one that starts with the nukes in WW3 after what I've been shown. President Elizabeth Warren, first woman president in the US. Don't believe me, watch and see.

-MM



posted on May, 4 2014 @ 06:53 AM
link   
God, I hope so. She would make a great President. Maybe we could get some democracy back. I know Hilary is a corporotist. Her as president and a republican congress is more policies for enriching the very rich who own them. I am looking at an independent to replace CMR in WA state.



posted on May, 4 2014 @ 06:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
God, I hope so. She would make a great President. Maybe we could get some democracy back. I know Hilary is a corporotist. Her as president and a republican congress is more policies for enriching the very rich who own them. I am looking at an independent to replace CMR in WA state.


I guess you missed the part that I posted about how Warren backed big corporations and got them 'off' on lawsuits against them from people who were poisoned by them. Corporations like DOW chemical. You might want to read the information I posted and then get back to us about how 'non big corporation' Warren supposedly is.



posted on May, 4 2014 @ 08:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
God, I hope so. She would make a great President. Maybe we could get some democracy back. I know Hilary is a corporotist. Her as president and a republican congress is more policies for enriching the very rich who own them. I am looking at an independent to replace CMR in WA state.


Hmmm.

Sure 'bout that?

"Democracy" is the problem.

"Republic" might be better.



Democracy is ruled by the omnipotent majority. In a Democracy, an individual, and any group of individuals composing any minority, have no protection against the unlimited power of the majority. It is a case of Majority-over-Man.


Republic a constitutionally limited government, of the representative type, created by a written Constitution--adopted by the people and changeable by them only by its amendment--with its powers divided between three separate branches of government.

Democracy or a Republic




posted on May, 4 2014 @ 09:11 AM
link   
a reply to: FlyersFan

Ok. I read all the negative reports. I don't care. Her "backing" of the corporations. That meant she was practicing law. I care about what she will do in Washington.



posted on May, 4 2014 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

If we are not a democracy, then we need to change the Preamble to the Constitution:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."



posted on May, 4 2014 @ 09:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Boscov

Well she has already been outed to be a ball faced liar so she is definitely qualified to be POTUS or maybe Hillary's VP.



posted on May, 4 2014 @ 09:39 AM
link   
Elizabeth Warren isn't going to run this time around, maybe as VP if Bernie Sanders decides to run.

Warren isn't a socialist.
Warren is cracking down hard on Wall Street and the banks.
Warren never claimed to be Native American on any school applications or job applications. She told colleagues that she is part Native American and Harvard decided to put that into their brochures.
You don't necessarily need to be licensed in a state in order to practice law in a state, it depends on how you are doing so.

For as many links painting issues where none exist, I can put up ones that prove them for the nonsense they are however I'm getting really tired of pissing matches and doing others work for them especially when after doing so, they aren't read. People choosing to believe propaganda are beyond hopeless... and really the only reason I'm posting at all is to let those not hypnotized by Rush and FOX know the info is out there, go find it. I'm burnt out.
edit on 5/4/2014 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join