Exploration company believes it may have found MH370

page: 1
18
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 12:50 PM
link   
I searched ATS and didn't find it posted yet....so here it is.

April 28, 2013, 7 News, Adelaide, Australia.

source

Seems they believe it is located on the NORTHERN TRACK of the RR engine data report....not the southern track where all the searching is currently taking place. I wonder if this area will get the same attention now?


The company, GeoResonance, says it's research has identified elements on the ocean floor consistent with material from a plane.




The team then verified it's findings by analyzing images from the same area on March 5, three days before the plane disappeared. The wreckage was not there prior to the disappearances of MH370.

edit on 4/28/2014 by Krakatoa because: Added quotes from article.




posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa
I searched ATS and didn't find it posted yet....so here it is.

April 28, 2013, 7 News, Adelaide, Australia.

source

Seems they believe it is located on the NORTHERN TRACK of the RR engine data report....not the southern track where all the searching is currently taking place. I wonder if this area will get the same attention now?



It says a lot when we have to find a lost airliner by looking for something else.



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 12:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

Looks promising if the data is correct



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

I never bought that murky, never before done, INMARSAT data calculation. I'm a harsh skeptic in areas I have expertise in.

Jury is still out on the new element. good find though.



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 01:12 PM
link   
Then there is another story reported today that a US Pilot has found the possible wreckage in the same place the plane vanished. So.Much.DISINFORMATION. it's so hard to sift through.



'I was taken aback because I couldn't believe I would find this,' he told the news channel.
Where is the plane? A map shows where Hoebel believes the plane is, compared to its intended flight (red line) and suspected flight path (in blue)
+9
Where is the plane? A map shows where Hoebel believes the plane is, compared to its intended flight (red line) and suspected flight path (in blue)
He pointed to the image on his computer as he explained why he thought it was the missing airliner.
'The lighter skin where the wing attaches to the fuselage - you see that lighter skin,' he said, comparing the grainy image to a photograph of the make of plane.
And when WIVB reporter Ed Drantch questioned if the shadow could be a shark, Hoebel responded: 'That's a 210ft shark.'



US Pilot believes he found wreckage



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 01:13 PM
link   
Just one question. Why was the lead not followed up on while the black box was still pinging?


An initial report was sent to authorities while the black box still had two weeks of battery power. The team then verified its findings by analysing images from the same area on March 5, three days before the plane disappeared. “The wreckage wasn’t there prior to the disappearance of MH370,” Mr Pope said. The full report was delivered on April 15.


Hopefully it is found. However my question remains: Why did no one from the search teams follow up on the lead? this IMO is flat out odd.



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 01:15 PM
link   
Reading the GeoResonance website, it seems this tech is mostly used in the oil and precious metals industry to find hard to detect deposits. However, they have also used it successfully in the past to find sunken WWII wrecks and unexploded ordinance too.

GeoResonance Web Site



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 01:15 PM
link   
It's ridiculous that there has been no official response back to this company. At the very least this has to be something man made, know or unknown. Who knows, the southern sweep could have been chasing blue whale survey pingers after all. Even a cursory search to begin with, I presume that the company has the co-ordinates.
edit on 28-4-2014 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Mamatus
That is a very good question. My opinion is it is not "politically" worthy of a follow-up. I wonder where the money trail leads regarding the decision to follow the InmarSat data exclusively. Would it step on political toes and get folks fired if they change now after all that search money was spent off the Australia coast?


edit on 4/28/2014 by Krakatoa because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 04:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mamatus
Just one question. Why was the lead not followed up on while the black box was still pinging?


An initial report was sent to authorities while the black box still had two weeks of battery power. The team then verified its findings by analysing images from the same area on March 5, three days before the plane disappeared. “The wreckage wasn’t there prior to the disappearance of MH370,” Mr Pope said. The full report was delivered on April 15.


Hopefully it is found. However my question remains: Why did no one from the search teams follow up on the lead? this IMO is flat out odd.

I would say, though I may be wrong, is that the statement about the 'black box' was a statement in general about any black box with the same timeline left to broadcast itself, in other words the need to look for black box signals in pretty much any area within reason. The search teams were only be following a series of known signals from their given area. like I said before you would think even a small portion of searchers could have acted on the possibility that there might be pings from something else in a different place.
edit on 28-4-2014 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

I would trust the data from a company that specialises in using this technology than some random pilot searching google earth. So for me this is encouraging news and hopefully will get followed up on.

It's probably worth adding the news to the MH 370 part 2 thread as well.



posted on Apr, 28 2014 @ 11:34 PM
link   
So i wounder how much the OCEAN FLOOR DATA, will be worth too the OIL COMP.,,,??

That is what these ,,instruments are actually used for right. ?

on the taxpayers dime, i might add.

Nice move ,,

Airplane ,, ya right,, lol,,

Oil Deposits,, hmmmm



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 07:27 AM
link   
There was a member that tried to post pictures here www.abovetopsecret.com...

could this possibly be the same location this company is talking about?

I felt bad for he/she at the time because of the heat he/she was receiving...could it be the same?



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 09:07 AM
link   
How would it fit in with the claimed data of events

- The plane floated for several hours making sat connections
- the sat connection data is actually wrong in some way (maybe in conjunction with above)
- the sat data really doesn't exist
- someone spoofed the plane connection for several hours
- Murphy's Law



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 09:14 AM
link   
Seems about right, but what caused the pings in the other area? Maybe some company that would benefit from the search planted something there. It would be like a fire fighter starting fires so they would show a need for their services, something that occasionally happens. People will do things to stir up business for their company. The ship that originally found the ping may not have anything to do with the problem, but it is possible someone set them up by dropping a ping creator there..

Now this new information should be investigated, maybe they will find something. It may just be someone dumping garbage also, but that should also be investigated, the ocean is not a dump.



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 09:18 AM
link   
By now, it should be outlawed that anything "Might be" "May be" "Could" "Indications suggest" "Experts agree" FOUND or Discovered.

Same thing for BREAKING NEWS!! on this topic.

Bring us a piece of evidence before getting everything all fired up... for naught.



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 10:33 AM
link   
How about the Chris Bollyn investigation which makes more sense?!


On March 26, 2014, investigative journalist Chris Bollyn broke what has probably been the most important story to date on the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 (MH370). With the befuddled and clueless mainstream media (MSM) parroting what the government was telling them and some theorizing anything from black holes to alien abduction, Bollyn reported that there was a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 identical to MH370 which had been stored in a hangar in Tel Aviv since November 2013.[1] For those knowledgeable of Israel’s long history of false flag attacks, the implications of such a long shot “coincidence” were alarming and frightening.

In October 2013 a Ft. Lauderdale, Florida-based company, GA Telesis (“GAT”), acquired a 15-year-old Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 (“GAT’s Malaysian 777”) from Kuwaiti-based ALAFCO Leasing (lessor to Malaysian Airlines). GAT’s Malaysian 777 was flown to the relatively small and seasonal Tarbes Lourdes Airport in France’s Pyrenees mountains around October 4, 2013.[2] This movement of the plane coincidently occurred a week after President Obama announced that the US would seek diplomatic solutions with Iran regarding its nuclear program. While the plane was at Tarbes Lourdes, the Malaysian Airlines name on the plane was apparently painted over, although the signatory red and blue stripes on the fuselage remained.


MH-370: Evidence Of False Flag

It's a big article and makes a hell of a lot of sense!



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 10:36 AM
link   
I once read that Earth's oceans are the least explored places on the planet. Assuming the plane's ultimate resting place is somewhere very watery and very deep, then the authorities' present inability to find the wreckage should be interpreted as proof of the ocean's mysteries versus incompetence.


Image Source: CBS



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 11:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Dorrell
Story overwhelmingly debunked elsewhere on ATS it was a completely different Malaysian airlines plane



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 12:06 PM
link   
Here's another article that includes the imaging from the company compared to MH370, it looks like a pretty close match--providing that the plane first made a water landing and didn't completely break apart.

It show the different metals and alloys detected and where those would correspond to locations on the plane.

www.cbsnews.com...
edit on 4/29/2014 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)





new topics
top topics
 
18
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join