It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
EW YORK/KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - A U.S.-based law firm said it expects to represent families of more than half of the passengers on board the missing Malaysian Airlines flight in a lawsuit against the carriers and Boeing Co , alleging the plane had crashed due to mechanical failure.
Our theory of the case is that there was a failure of the equipment in the cockpit that may have caused a fire that rendered the crew unconscious, or perhaps because of the defects in the fuselage which had been reported before there was some loss in the cabin pressure that also made the pilot and co-pilot unconscious," Monica Kelly, head of Global Aviation Litigation at Ribbeck Law, told reporters.
"That plane was actually a ghost plane for several hours until it ran out of fuel."
crucified
How greedy
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Well, if they can't even produce a plane, then good luck with the lawsuit. We don't even know where the hell it is, where the people are, or what caused it to go down. They don't have a case.
gardener
Tsk, tsk, now where in avionic history have we heard of fires bring planes down?
JohnTheSmith
crucified
How greedy
You're one-liner is an ugly thing. Seriously, that's all you can muster?
How are these people greedy, they want to know wtf is up.
50+%. That's crazy. This is going to be huge, and I honestly am quite shocked they found a firm to take this case. This could be a giant can of worms, but the firm will most likely back out before it goes to court.
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Well, if they can't even produce a plane, then good luck with the lawsuit. We don't even know where the hell it is, where the people are, or what caused it to go down. They don't have a case.
Oh I beg to differ. The Malaysian authorities already admitted (Whoops!) to having classified information. That alone will probably be enough to launch a lonngggg court battle.edit on 3 29 2014 by JohnTheSmith because: Responding to Skadi.
crucified
reply to post by JohnTheSmith
But you know where it's going right after that? Money its gonna be all about the Benjamin's mark my words I mean type. In the future try not to act so dramatic over the internet it's really goofy.
seattletimes.com...
Perhaps worse for Boeing, the resolution to the export question last year did not comprehensively solve the broad underlying problem — so that the issue of dual-use technology could arise again to threaten the company's ability to sell airplanes. The State Department charges against Boeing relate to the export of jets that contain a gyroscopic microchip called QRS-11, used as a backup system in determining a plane's orientation in the air. Though a Boeing document refers to the chip as "relatively unsophisticated" technology, the gyrochip also has been used to help stabilize and steer guided missiles. In the draft charging letter, the State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls alleges that between 2000 and 2003 Boeing broke export control laws in shipping to China and other countries what was then classified as militarily significant technology. Further, it claims the company did so deliberately and repeatedly even after it had been warned to stop.