It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The Machines

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 14 2014 @ 12:45 AM


If school has taught us anything, it was how to absorb and regurgitate information and culture in a systematic and orderly fashion. We receive input in the form of language, we compute that information, and are expected to recite it upon request, just like a computer. By that practice we are taught the way of the machine.

At school we never learned about our humanity and how to live, but we learned the customs of an ideal citizen and member of the herd, a once unique stone to be polished smooth to what is customary and same. It should be called How to Have a Career 101. How to retain whatever facts and histories are told to us 101. They don’t teach wisdom, but rules and conduct, how to be a cog. Our differences shall be shamed, and our similarities rewarded. “Join the meritocracy. We shall see you as drones before you learn anything of your own faculties”.

They don’t teach the Trivium anymore because it has become “trivial” (quite literally for you etymologists), but it is more likely because a student of the Trivium is no longer programmed by the machine, but a programmer of it.


And speaking of programming, people now get home from their jobs to watch shows about jobs. Nevermind, it's too difficult to think about.


I have a friend who is a genius in the literal sense. He has the IQ, the speed of calculation, the impressive memory and can solve a rubix cube in seconds. He has a career, a family and is by all appearances, an ideal citizen. But put him on the street in Tokyo—bodies about, pubs, laughter, commotion, chaos and noise, with little of the past to hold on to— all that computing power disappears in the face of the sensual world, and he falls into himself with the body language that says it doesn’t like what and where it is at that moment. He tells me he isn’t comfortable with it, that he’s an “introvert”, that he doesn’t want to be noticed. He knows, but as of yet, does not recognize his own power. He has not formed his wisdom, the artistry and the “know thyself” enough to apply himself to the best of his ability to the act of living, yet he can play the machine at the flick of a switch. It took a couple more hours and about ten pints for me to convince him of this malady. We philosophized about it for a while, and there he made the goal to give himself a chance at wisdom, by applying himself to life.


But how does the machines guide our wisdom these days? Look around.

Have you ever been to an intimate concert and the person in front of you films entire sections of it on an iPad, and you’re forced to watch the very concert you are a part of through the back-lit, low-resolution of a 9 by 7 screen? It is the most profound yet upsetting of situations. A product of the environment no less—taught to hold up a screen on a pedestal and watch life through it. “Your life, your virtue, your wisdom is in here”. Isn’t this what we were taught?

Or what about a gathering of friends, seventy percent of them fingering their devices, passing them about as if they were plates of appetizers so that others may take part in their screen lifestyle. The only people that matter at that moment are the very people sitting beside you, yet you won’t even look them in the eye when you talk to them, because a text is more needing of your attention.

And it is no strange fact that there is now an entire generation of children who will grow up asking “Mommy, why is my picture already on the internet?” Because child, mommy has a profile to uphold, a machine version of her life that you are now a part of. Of course, many think that we are our profiles and avatars, the egos of our egos, these perverse abstractions of ourselves. But we are not, and this vanity is no different than invoking spirits and base superstitions. If we walked away from our profiles and avatars, never to turn them on again, we would be better off thereby. Certainly, we are not the little digital people we have made. They are not us; they are the result of us.

Nonetheless, we are such good little machines.


Don’t remember something? Google it. Need to know what it’s like base jump? YouTube it. Having a debate on revolutionary principles? Wiki it. Need to prove something? Share a link. It is apparent that we throw our information around more than we do our own wisdom. The machine has taught us well.

Wisdom is a training found in the school of hard knocks—the only training worth taking—but by the time we graduate it’s usually too late.

posted on Jan, 14 2014 @ 01:17 AM
It has been a dream of mine to open a Liberal Arts orphanage, and by liberal arts, I mean THE seven liberal arts. Why orphans? Modern parents just get in the way. I am a HUGE fan of the trivium and quadrivium. I had to learn to think for myself by myself, and I would like the opportunity to give youngs minds what I didn't receive: an opportunity to think, ask questions, and come up with their own answers. If I have my own children that have to go to public/private school, their teachers are going to hate them, because I'll be teaching them at home, as well.

posted on Jan, 14 2014 @ 02:46 PM
I'm afraid I don't have anything to add, but wanted to say that I enjoyed your rant. Spot on and well stated.

posted on Jan, 14 2014 @ 09:35 PM
reply to post by Galadriel

I'm afraid I don't have anything to add, but wanted to say that I enjoyed your rant. Spot on and well stated.

Thanks for reading, I'm glad you liked it. It feels good to get it off the chest!

posted on Jan, 16 2014 @ 01:53 PM
There's nothing wrong with looking up things on Google. In the near future, value and wage will be determined by how fast you can find and apply information.

Education will also be revolutionalized, hopefully tomorrow but should have been done yesterday. It's because of people who cling to the old ways keep putting people down who want to move forward to the new ways. But it appears each generation wants their kids to build robots for them while kids get caught up in the old ways and do the same to their kids. Build robots, just no social changes. Don't mobilize the world so everyone will become equal and money would be gone. Besides, it's all unrealistic. And usually that is when the child turns, imagination disappears and we all have to wait longer because imagination is what is needed to initiate changes, to imagine people getting replaced but also seeing them prosper after that because we all have enough food, water, housing, clothing, energy and appliances to make live easier.

No where in history was it possible for a 10 year old to carry around a trillion books. Let alone in the form of something like Nao, which could do well in a walking talking google bot with a lot of funny routines to make the child laugh and ofcourse displays with original historic movies and arts, archeology. But each day oppertunities are wasted, trillions of money held by a few could make an eternal difference if they invested it in robots and children so they'd grow up better educated with a programming language just as normal as english or maths.

Really, all the tech is there, the resources, manpower just missing one central organization to mobilize everyone. Just a few decades and the bulk of the work could be done and people could by best comparison 'retire' while still sustainable. But few people realize this or can imagine it. Can anyone imagine that? Because it's not difficult to put a price tag on a baby or how it's indebted from birth but how about a baby born into a world where it is born retired and doesn't have to worry about anything at all.
edit on 16-1-2014 by spiritspeak because: (no reason given)

top topics

log in