It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
bitsforbytes
Has the effects of suspended artificially created clouds over large distances been studied yet
Aloysius the Gaul
smurfy
conspiracytheoristIAM
reply to post by St0rD
Hard to imagine that chaff somehow sounds like chem-trail. I listened twice to 42 second clip, only chaff was mentioned by the weatherman !
Nope, he also said "unusual" so either Chaff exercises are unusual or they are not, or did he mean the size of the exercise was unusual. It is an old video, but that's not the point. If the chaff was the usual Aluminium, was there a possibiity of harm to people below and the answer is a simple yes.
In what way can chaff hurt people? It is too small to do any kinetic damage by falling on them, and too large to be ingested and pass into the blood stream.
The only thing to acknowledge is the size of particles and the spread. The smaller the particle, the more it can enter the respiritory organs where it should not be, and has no place.
We know how big chaff is - the wiki page has a picture of an opened bundle (warning - it's a 20mb pdf download)
The GAO did an audit of het potential effects of chaff::
While DOD components report that chaff is an effective means of defense for aircraft, ships, and related weapon systems, DOD and
other agencies have identified some unintended and potential side effects of chaff. Chaff can affect safety by interfering with air
traffic control radar. Chaff can also affect weather radar observations and the operation of friendly radar systems, especially
when vehicles stir up chaff that has settled on the ground. It has been reported that chaff has also caused power outages and damaged
electrical equipment. Potential effects cited by Defense and other organizations include those on health and the environment. For
example, the Air Force reported that chaff has a potential but remote chance of collecting in reservoirs and causing chemical changes that
may affect water and the species that use it.
So apart from eth potential for aluminium to dissolve into water (which is NIL! At the time of the report the US still had lead based chaff in stock, which would be of serious concern) there is no threat to anyone or anything except radar and electronics - note that the US tried to KO Iraqi and Serbian power grids using something considerably more sophisticated than chaff - because chaff isn't very good at doing that either!edit on 8-1-2014 by Aloysius the Gaul because: add links & textedit on 8-1-2014 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
St0rD
I always find it disturbing to hear people claiming we have nothing to worry about with questionnable subject like this.
Why are you so sure that putting chemicals in the sky that has nothing to do there in the first place, can do no harm to the environment? What about birds?
Tell me please.
It's not like we humans have always been right in the past, huh?
Seriously, we will need to stop listening to these so-callled experts one day and start thinking by ourselves.
Nature is perfect and it's been at least 100 years mankind is doing everything he is able to destroy the ultimate balanced environment earth provides to us.
And he is doing a pretty good damn job.
bitsforbytes
Breathing in chaff is not good because breathing in aluminum is just not good no science needed, breathing in chemicals that are put in the sky by man is not good.
Let us disregard the matter of WHAT these chemtrails are made of and let's focus on the fact that they stay there. TRAILS made by airplanes DO stay suspended in the sky for 10 minutes to several hours and create a web of artificial icy crystal filled clouds that block sunlight when sunlight should be passing through. Some argue that this is too small to make a difference, however do we really know when too small reaches the point of being too big? Have we reached it yet?
snarky412
reply to post by St0rD
I bet his producers cringed when he stated that.....plus him saying that he was in the Marine Corp and he knows for a fact that's what they do
Interesting
That's not to say I believe in chemtrails but remarks like these leaves the door wide open for any mis-interpretation
St0rD
Well, I understand this isn't the common chemtrails conspiracy we hear everywhere around the internet, but in my in mind, this is literally 'chemical trails' being dropped in the sky for whatever reasons the military thought necessary.
DrumStickNinja
reply to post by St0rD
Crazy that it shows up on radar. I actually live in Southern Oregon and watch this news channel frequently. Missed this one! Something to note is that this is a small network area, meaning maybe 100,000 potential viewers. I say potential because, of course, not everyone watches channel 10 news.
Good find. Whether it's metallic particles or brain controlling chemicals, you can't deny that they are dropping something.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by St0rD
Here I am going to try and help you out there.
It's called chafe and it has nothing to do with chemtrails.
Chaff, originally called Window[1] by the British, and Düppel by the Second World War era German Luftwaffe (from the Berlin suburb where it was first developed), is a radar countermeasure in which aircraft or other targets spread a cloud of small, thin pieces of aluminium, metallized glass fibre or plastic, which either appears as a cluster of primary targets on radar screens or swamps the screen with multiple returns.
en.wikipedia.org...(countermeasure)
Bedlam
St0rD
Well, I understand this isn't the common chemtrails conspiracy we hear everywhere around the internet, but in my in mind, this is literally 'chemical trails' being dropped in the sky for whatever reasons the military thought necessary.
Well, if you want to go with that definition, oxygen, nitrogen, water vapor, CO2 and the like that make up air are all also chemicals. So every bit of atmosphere on the planet is a big permanent chemtrail, forever.
loveguy
I see why this would be practiced in a war zone (defensive maneuver), but I don't see why it's practiced outside of a war zone?
network dude
loveguy
I see why this would be practiced in a war zone (defensive maneuver), but I don't see why it's practiced outside of a war zone?
Practice/training. None of this is free, so they don't pop off chaff and flare on every mission, but they do use them during training missions. Chaff shows up on radar. (as the video clearly shows) so it's not something that can be done "covertly".
Flaws
The doctrine has six major flaws:
It was an open door to the abuse of authority; it required that the parties in question could be said to have acted independently, which in the end was tantamount to giving them license to act independently.[15]
It rarely worked when invoked; the denials made were rarely plausible and were generally seen through by both the media and the populace.[16] One aspect of the Watergate crisis is the repeated failure of the doctrine of plausible deniability, which the administration repeatedly attempted to use to stop the scandal affecting President Richard Nixon and his aides.
"Plausible denial" only increases the risk of misunderstanding between senior officials and their employees.[17]
It only shifts blame, and generally, constructs rather little.
If the claim fails, it seriously discredits the political figure invoking it as a defense.
If it succeeds, it creates the impression that the government is not in control of the state.
loveguy
I see why this would be practiced in a war zone (defensive maneuver), but I don't see why it's practiced outside of a war zone?
St0rD
I don't understand how you can compare aluminium and plastic in the sky to oxygen and CO2 but I guess you must have your reasons...