It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MarsIsRed
reply to post by JadeStar
In theory, we should be able to directly image any rocky planet in high resolution - at least in a way. I thought about this years ago, and the idea is pretty sound.
As a planet rotates, you'd need to image it many times - perhaps every 5 degrees of rotation, for many exo-days. The slight variation in brightness allows you to create a 'difference map' between the area that left the field of view, and the area that just emerged. Over many observations, and assuming a true earth analogy, you could easily create a reasonably accurate estimate of the relative distribution between land and sea (and cloud cover).
symptomoftheuniverse
reply to post by JadeStar
Thanks for the info, so the halo appears to be in the habital zone? Life on earth started early on so life could arrise even if it is only for a billion years or so.
Seen as were on ATS i will speculate that its evidence of a class 3 civilisation harnessing and shaping a new living solar system,but i may be wrong.. thanks again.
Fantastic video thankyou. It seems dust in space is equivalant to rocks on mars when looking for civilisations lol. i enjoyed the video thanks again
JadeStar
symptomoftheuniverse
reply to post by JadeStar
Thanks for the info, so the halo appears to be in the habital zone? Life on earth started early on so life could arrise even if it is only for a billion years or so.
The halo is not in the habitable zone. However as someone said, there could be planets within it. And you're right, life on earth came about early on, however early in this case means 3.6 billion years ago. Or roughly 1 billion years after the formation of the solar system. This system is only around 8 million years old. By the time it is 1 billion years old, those planets will be cooked. So just as life is starting to evolve, it will be fried.
Seen as were on ATS i will speculate that its evidence of a class 3 civilisation harnessing and shaping a new living solar system,but i may be wrong.. thanks again.
Nah it's just dust... You might like this video though:
edit on 8-1-2014 by JadeStar because: (no reason given)
These near-infrared images (1.5-1.8 microns) show the planet glowing in infrared light from the heat released in its formation.
amurphy245
It just blows the mind to think that there are billions of worlds out there ,so far away we can barely see them and you see these images and wonder if life is there,makes me wonder how many civilisations are looking at us in there telescopes.
Beamish
reply to post by MarsIsRed
These near-infrared images (1.5-1.8 microns) show the planet glowing in infrared light from the heat released in its formation.
That's an amazing photograph. Sends a chill down the spine. However, as to the above quote (and in the vein of wishful thinking); wouldn't it be mind-numbing if they came back with a correction:
"The observable light formerly perceived to have been produced by the planet's formation has now been - after further and much deeper analysis - to be something totally different. It appears to be defined within the perimeter of the planet's circumference; in fact, though incredibly bright, it is confined to specific, and non-regular geographical areas. It is our pleasure to announce that the light seen is in fact artificial; what we are seeing is the night-side glow of colossal towns and cities."
It can only be a matter of time before we read something like the above piece of fantasy. Personally, I can't wait.
I had the rare chance to use the Hale telescope in a set of observations supporting a GALEX program, since coinvestigator Scott Chapman was at Caltech (at which point the Palomar page was promoted from the "tourist" section of this site). This became a more interesting experience than I anticipated, since a failure in a supporting rail meant that we couldn't point the dome toward any of our targets for half of the observing run. Until a specialist welder from Seattle finished his repairs, we could look only at things which were visible with the dome stuck pointing toward the northeast. My instructions from the site director for the first two nights were "have fun and try to do something interesting". Wherever Hubble is buried, there were vibrations from underground... Here are some art shots, snippets from the 24-arcminute field covered by the 6-CCD mosaic camera. The Crescent Nebula, NGC 6888, is a windblown bubble produced by the fierce wind from its central Wolf-Rayet star. It spans most of the mosaic field (shown here in a single exposure before processing to fill in the gaps with other exposures).
Next, we zoom in to the brightest star-forming association in the Andromeda Galaxy, NGC 206. Myriads of giant and supergiant stars are resolved on this single CCD.
i think the image of gliese above your last post contradicts you somewhat.
wildespace
reply to post by Wolfenz
Stars can be seen clearly because they are very bright. Exoplanets or brown dwarfs are very dim, and require enhanced techniques that don't always produce nice and clear images.
You can't see an exoplanet unless you cover the star, otherwise the star's bright light completely drowns the planet out.
symptomoftheuniverse
i think the image of gliese above your last post contradicts you somewhat.
wildespace
reply to post by Wolfenz
Stars can be seen clearly because they are very bright. Exoplanets or brown dwarfs are very dim, and require enhanced techniques that don't always produce nice and clear images.
You can't see an exoplanet unless you cover the star, otherwise the star's bright light completely drowns the planet out.
Beamish
reply to post by JadeStar
I haven't read that thread, and I'm sorry if I duplicated your premise!
It just seems like the obvious way to induct us all on this little blue rock into the concept of life "elsewhere", to see photographic evidence of a civilization that is countless years away from us.
The photo in the OP still sends shivers down the spine...
aha a brown dwarf not a planet.
JadeStar
symptomoftheuniverse
i think the image of gliese above your last post contradicts you somewhat.
wildespace
reply to post by Wolfenz
Stars can be seen clearly because they are very bright. Exoplanets or brown dwarfs are very dim, and require enhanced techniques that don't always produce nice and clear images.
You can't see an exoplanet unless you cover the star, otherwise the star's bright light completely drowns the planet out.
Actually it doesn't.
Gliese 229 B is a Brown Dwarf. A class of star, sort of.
This is why it gets a capital "B" as a binary star would instead of a small "b" as a planet would.
Brown dwarfs, while, smaller and cooler than stars are huge compared to planets in terms of mass.
Gliese 229 B is anywhere from 20 to 50 times more massive than Jupiter and has a temperature of 950K (676.85C, 1250F).
That is hot enough to glow brightly in the near-infrared where that picture was taken (which is why you see it as a false color image btw).
Gliese 229 B also orbits a small low mass and dim star called a red dwarf which means the glare of the star it orbits is minimal.
Gliese 229 B also orbits at 41 astronomical units (AU) out. That's just a little further out than Pluto orbits the Sun, which means that there is a great deal of separation between Gliese 229 A and B so that B could be resolved easily.
This is far different than resolving closer in orbiting, lower mass objects like planets around a more massive Sunlike (F,G,K) star.