It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor, it is not; however, regardless of his opinion, his recent plea for clemency to the White House and congressional intelligence committee leaders has been rejected.
Feinstein remarked that Snowden has “done this enormous disservice to our country. I think the answer is no clemency.” She also stated that he could have spoken directly to her committee privately instead of going to the media.
Maybe he was afraid of being in the news the next day! HEADLINE NEWS: Edward Snowden a former contractor for the NSA was found dead this morning(of natural causes of course).
Not surprisingly, both Feinstein and Rogers have been met with intense criticism for defending the actions of the NSA.
So what you are essentially saying is that he should have kept his mouth shut and allowed "Big Brother" to continue with business as usual, even though that business was a crime? I guess every law has a flaw somewhere If the law doesn't fit...don't try to apply it!
Em2013
reply to post by colddeadhands
You sir have made a fool out of Betteridge's Law of Headlines. I demand an apology! And since you were asking the question I'm going with "yes, it's a crime but not officially, directly that is".
Divine Strake
Well, let's say someone tells the "truth", and that truth incites a riot, which is a crime. We then must weigh the value of the truth against the negative outcome.
So, for example, the truth might be that the U.S. intercepts billions of data transfers in every country. Yet, releasing that truth can bring about negative results for the country, so, this is how they might define someone as a terrorist with treasonous motives.
My opinion is now that yes, telling the truth can be a crime. I don't completely agree with it, but such is the world in which we live.
We PAY the government to intercept billions of data transfers in every country! We do NOT support violating the rights of the citizens of the United States!! If there is a legitimate reason to suspect that someone is involved in terrorist actions then by all means please monitor them, but to blanket monitor the entire population of our great nation is a CRIME!!! To reveal this truth to the people should not be considered criminal!
Divine Strake
Well, let's say someone tells the "truth", and that truth incites a riot, which is a crime. We then must weigh the value of the truth against the negative outcome.
So, for example, the truth might be that the U.S. intercepts billions of data transfers in every country. Yet, releasing that truth can bring about negative results for the country, so, this is how they might define someone as a terrorist with treasonous motives.
My opinion is now that yes, telling the truth can be a crime. I don't completely agree with it, but such is the world in which we live.
She also stated that he could have spoken directly to her committee privately instead of going to the media.
Is speaking the truth a crime?