It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Amnesty International has accused the Obama administration of "war crimes" in its drone policy in a new report released Tuesday. The human rights organization reviewed forty-five drone strikes in the Pakistani providence of Waziristan since January 2012, and concluded that they "have resulted in hundreds of civilian deaths, some of which may amount to extrajudicial executions or war crimes under international law.
The Amnesty report was covered by National Public Radio and CNN on Tuesday, as well as a few other sources. However, the New York Times article ignored the explosive "war crimes" accusation.
Two influential human rights groups say they have freshly documented dozens of civilian deaths in U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen, contradicting assertions by the Obama administration that such casualties are rare.
In Yemen, Human Rights Watch investigated six selected airstrikes since 2009 and concluded that at least 57 of the 82 people killed were civilians, including a pregnant woman and three children who perished in a September 2012 attack.
In Pakistan, Amnesty International investigated nine suspected U.S. drone strikes that occurred between May 2012 and July 2013 in the territory of North Waziristan. The group said it found strong evidence that more than 30 civilians were killed in four of the attacks.
The groups’ findings coincide with a report released Friday by a U.N. human rights investigator, who estimated that 2,200 people have been killed in drone strikes over the past decade in Pakistan.
U.N. Special Rapporteur Ben Emmerson said that preliminary information gathered for a new report indicated more than 450 civilians may have been killed by drone strikes in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Yemen, but more work needs to be done to confirm the figures.
The single greatest obstacle to an evaluation of the civilian impact of drone strikes is lack of transparency, which makes it extremely difficult to assess claims of precision targeting objectively,” said the report, which was released Friday. The lack of transparency “creates an accountability vacuum and affects the ability of victims to seek redress.”
Josephus
Has a Nobel Peace Prize laureate ever completed such a successful 180 before? It's like reality has become a comedy of errors.
UN Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights Ben Emmerson wrote in March of this year, “As a matter of international law, the US drone campaign is therefore being conducted without the consent of the elected representatives of the people, or the legitimate government of the state. It involves the use of force on the territory of another state without its consent, and is therefore a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.”
Yes. Instead of a mod closing this thread as is normal with duplicate threads. They've allowed it continue. It's quite obvious what is going on here.The blatant conservative bias has become the death knell of my interest in this site. I will not continue to be part of a community that falsely claims to be unbiased. Truth is in actions, not words.
elouina
What's done is done. We already discussed this and I was sitting back and letting my thread die a graceful death. But you just bumped my thread up. But think of it this way, the more attention for the cause, the better.
Next week two children who were injured by drone strikes in Pakistan plan to testify in front of Congress on the effects of the drone program at the request of Florida Rep. Alan Grayson, a Democrat.
damwel
Right, drone strikes are war crimes but torture, illegal wars and war profiteering by Bush/Cheney was just protecting the US and fighting terrorists. You people need to make up your minds which way is right. I already know how you make up your minds, it's really obvious, whatever Obama does is wrong. Geesh even a blind squirrel finds an acorn occasionally.
You're more than free to provide proof that the people in this thread said that what Obama did was wrong and what Bush did was right. Granted, it won't change the fact that you're trying to derail that thread, but at least it's better than trying to derail with a baseless accusation.
damwel
Right, drone strikes are war crimes but torture, illegal wars and war profiteering by Bush/Cheney was just protecting the US and fighting terrorists. You people need to make up your minds which way is right. I already know how you make up your minds, it's really obvious, whatever Obama does is wrong. Geesh even a blind squirrel finds an acorn occasionally.