It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
charles1952
reply to post by boncho
I'm not sure I'm following you here.
You seem to be saying that Americans are unable to choose effective leaders, so we should let people from outside of our country choose our leaders, on the grounds that we don't know how to do it, but the people in Belgium, Chile, Africa, China, and Syria do?
I'm afraid we'll get still more ineffective leaders with total, inescapable, control over the world. I don't think I like that picture.
paraphi
On pharmaceuticals to keep with the topic.
New laws to rule to world...
(....)
On a wider note for new laws to rule the world...
(...)
I know that people fear the NWO, but new global laws which include the above can only benefit mankind.
Regards
boncho
charles1952
reply to post by boncho
I'm not sure I'm following you here.
You seem to be saying that Americans are unable to choose effective leaders, so we should let people from outside of our country choose our leaders, on the grounds that we don't know how to do it, but the people in Belgium, Chile, Africa, China, and Syria do?
I'm afraid we'll get still more ineffective leaders with total, inescapable, control over the world. I don't think I like that picture.
I'm saying fundamental laws need to be drafted to encapsulate the entire world. So it limits how much one nation can exploit another, and to reach objectives as a human race, not a person on a totem pole.
Sly1one
boncho
charles1952
reply to post by boncho
I'm not sure I'm following you here.
You seem to be saying that Americans are unable to choose effective leaders, so we should let people from outside of our country choose our leaders, on the grounds that we don't know how to do it, but the people in Belgium, Chile, Africa, China, and Syria do?
I'm afraid we'll get still more ineffective leaders with total, inescapable, control over the world. I don't think I like that picture.
I'm saying fundamental laws need to be drafted to encapsulate the entire world. So it limits how much one nation can exploit another, and to reach objectives as a human race, not a person on a totem pole.
If a nation is willing or already engaging in exploiting another nation...the implementation of a LAW is suddenly supposed to make exploitation seem unappealing to said nation?
What are laws without enforcement? ok...so now with this worldly LAW we need a worldly POLICE...
can I ask how this is simply just not re-creating a larger version of the same problems?
I tend to agree with the statement that you can't fix problems with the same thinking that created them...
can we HONESTLY not come up with something better than laws and police...all over again?
I'm honestly curious here...