Whatever Happened To The Anunnaki Ailens?

reply to post by Ploutonas


If you would please;

Define: "4th density", and "what" a dimension is.

reply to post by tanka418

 

Where on Earth (or off) did you manage to get this attribution?!??

When i received the email request i was living in Durban, South Africa, May 2010.

reply to post by Rapha


Ya know, my 18yo is overly logical, and very precise / literal. I try to tell him that isn't going to work, but, of course he ignores me; he's 18...nature of the beast.

So now, that you have not answered my question, care to try again? This time let's not be quite so literal.

reply to post by tanka418

 

So now, that you have not answered my question, care to try again? This time let's not be quite so literal.

Why do some people have to make a mountain out of a mole-hill ?
Assuming "Explanatory attribution" on
en.wikipedia.org...(psychology)

the chain of events started from a vision that lead to the repented fallen angel contact who verified it was Tartarus.

timenolonger.ning.com...

This story is based on a vision that I experienced when on morphine at a local hospital. This vision occurred after a brain operation that I believed, at the time, had gone fatally wrong and I had died. Little did I know at the time of the vision that I was actually in the I.C.U.

The part where it says “foolish mistakes” that my mother committed relates to witchcraft. This includes ink bowl visions, tarot card reading and summoning negative entities which involved me during my childhood. Little did I know at the time that this witchcraft was all real.

.....

The contact occurred after this event.

Rapha
Why do some people have to make a mountain out of a mole-hill ?

One can but wonder; Why, you obfuscate so much.

I was originally wondering about this attribution:

Then in that case i was contacted by Azazel (a.k.a Ozza, Oz, Odin) who is a seraph,

Especially how you attempt to attribute Odin, a god, as a Seraphim. Something, I was taught, was quite improper.

tanka418
reply to post by Ploutonas

 

If you would please;
Define: "4th density", and "what" a dimension is.

If you would please respectfully define the "3rd density normality" and what if it is a dimension what is it, if lighter in frequency than the 3.0 or obligatory 3.3 would be somewhere within the 4th or 5th ranges? Can we wifi it frequency wise? Ive heard the 4D is not where you want to be as it is a NEGATIVE HOLDING ENERGY PLATFORM. Dispersal central. What is it you require?

tanka418

Rapha
Why do some people have to make a mountain out of a mole-hill ?

One can but wonder; Why, you obfuscate so much.

I was originally wondering about this attribution:

Then in that case i was contacted by Azazel (a.k.a Ozza, Oz, Odin) who is a seraph,

Especially how you attempt to attribute Odin, a god, as a Seraphim. Something, I was taught, was quite improper.

Obfuscate so much because the real truth will blow so many minds that they will instantly deny it.

Example, sin is in everyones DNA. This is how everyone is born into the Book of Life at birth.
Then at the first moment of sin, that sinner's DNA changes and they are removed from the Book.
Only through pure repentence in the perfect DNA of Yahushua is that name written back into the Book of Life.
Hence only Born Again Christians and innocent children are written into the Book of Life.

Atheist scientists will scoff at the idea. Yet it is all written in the Bible.

Rapha

Atheist scientists will scoff at the idea. Yet it is all written in the Bible.

...and the Bible is a scientific book? The Bible was written by a bunch of people a couple thousands of years ago. It holds no scientific water.

-SAP-

Rapha

tanka418

Rapha
Why do some people have to make a mountain out of a mole-hill ?

One can but wonder; Why, you obfuscate so much.

I was originally wondering about this attribution:

Then in that case i was contacted by Azazel (a.k.a Ozza, Oz, Odin) who is a seraph,

Especially how you attempt to attribute Odin, a god, as a Seraphim. Something, I was taught, was quite improper.

Obfuscate so much because the real truth will blow so many minds that they will instantly deny it.

Example, sin is in everyones DNA. This is how everyone is born into the Book of Life at birth.
Then at the first moment of sin, that sinner's DNA changes and they are removed from the Book.
Only through pure repentence in the perfect DNA of Yahushua is that name written back into the Book of Life.
Hence only Born Again Christians and innocent children are written into the Book of Life.

Atheist scientists will scoff at the idea. Yet it is all written in the Bible.

I think Atheists scientists would indeed scoff at your idea because they don't believe in the Bible.

Rapha

Example, sin is in everyones DNA. This is how everyone is born into the Book of Life at birth.
Then at the first moment of sin, that sinner's DNA changes and they are removed from the Book.
Only through pure repentence in the perfect DNA of Yahushua is that name written back into the Book of Life.
Hence only Born Again Christians and innocent children are written into the Book of Life.

Atheist scientists will scoff at the idea. Yet it is all written in the Bible.

Not all scientists are atheists, and there are plenty of perfectly valid non-religios reasons to scoff at your ideas.


There are also religious reasons to scoff at your ideas. For instance, we are all born with original sin, so there is no innocence. As a "Christian" you should know this.

And please link the DNA bible quote for me.

reply to post by draknoir2

Not all scientists are atheists

But all "atheist scientists" are atheists. I think that can proven.

Rapha
Obfuscate so much because the real truth will blow so many minds that they will instantly deny it.

And so it becomes important to deny them the truth, and reality of the world they live in. Thus beginning the degradation of the system as a whole due to lack of understanding; the result is a world like you currently have.

It has been said that the only real/true "Sin" is restriction, and in a case like this that is very true. You restrict the truth; that is the SIN here.

Example, sin is in everyones DNA. This is how everyone is born into the Book of Life at birth.
Then at the first moment of sin, that sinner's DNA changes and they are removed from the Book.
Only through pure repentence in the perfect DNA of Yahushua is that name written back into the Book of Life.
Hence only Born Again Christians and innocent children are written into the Book of Life.

Atheist scientists will scoff at the idea. Yet it is all written in the Bible.

HorseS*** There is NO sin incorporated into anyone's DNA! It isn't even physically possible for that to occur. One's DNA does not change because of a night of drunken debauchery or the wanton destruction of a whole society. And, more importantly, deciding to believe in something will not, cannot change One's DNA.

Just how does this "Sin" thing work anyway? Your Bible talks about "original sin", then centuries later Jesus comes along and "dies for our sins". His death upon the cross was supposed to forgive us of ALL our sins. Thus "Original Sin" is forgiven, and no longer a factor. (your God removed it from the equation). Yet many still try to use this a leverage to recruit into their religion. Kind of unethical don't you think? Perhaps bordering of "Capital Sin", in as much as YOU are deciding for God how thing are to be.

Did you know; statistically speaking, most scientists are quite religious? Yep, most believe in the same god as you, they go to church and worship, not unlike most of the terrestrial human population. So, they not quite atheist. Course, just like most of the religious world, they are not very spiritual.

And, Thank the Gods of Andromeda I'm NOT Christian!

draknoir2
There are also religious reasons to scoff at your ideas. For instance, we are all born with original sin, so there is no innocence. As a "Christian" you should know this.

And please link the DNA bible quote for me.

It was morning and i was in a rush. i agree, we all have sin in our DNA. However it is only activated once we sin against Yahushua and know we are sinning.

Exod. 32:33: "And the LORD said to Moses, "Whoever has sinned against Me, I will blot him out of My book." If one dies without forgiveness of their sins their name vanishes out of the record book of life.

Ps. 139:16: "Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them." God knows who are his, even before they are born, everyone who lives is written in the book of life.

So there it is. All in the Bible.
1) Initially everyone is in the Book of Life.
2) As soon as a sin occurs they are blotted out of the Book.

But of course, denialists are programmed to believe nothing if the word DNA is not in the Bible.

Oh what a joke this world of denial has transformed into. Lucifer has a bounty of denialists on his hands on Judgement Day. LOL

Rapha


But of course, denialists are programmed to believe nothing if the word DNA is not in the Bible.

Oh what a joke this world of denial has transformed into. Lucifer has a bounty of denialists on his hands on Judgement Day. LOL

I am programmed to believe the Bible does not refer to DNA if DNA is never actually mentioned in the Bible.

I guess that makes me a DNAlist.

Rapha

Exod. 32:33: "And the LORD said to Moses, "Whoever has sinned against Me, I will blot him out of My book." If one dies without forgiveness of their sins their name vanishes out of the record book of life.

Ps. 139:16: "Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them." God knows who are his, even before they are born, everyone who lives is written in the book of life.

So if I were to "enter into league" with the Annunaki and, for short time, become "evil incarnate"; at the end of which I ask for "forgiveness from God", then its "all good"? Do you have any idea how wrong this notion is?

So there it is. All in the Bible.
1) Initially everyone is in the Book of Life.
2) As soon as a sin occurs they are blotted out of the Book.

But of course, denialists are programmed to believe nothing if the word DNA is not in the Bible.

Again with the obfuscation; Where does it say anything about DNA in the bible? Where is it even hinted at; that One's DNA can be altered by simply "believing" in jesus? (lower case intentional)

What I find interesting is how Christians, and many others defend their belief system, while all the time it is a eleif system [I]given to them by the Annunaki[/I]. Government and religion are two of the best was for a sall number of people to control large numbers.

This article begins to scratch the surface. There are some other papers there as well on local ET life and what would be called Annunaki.

vethumanbeing

tanka418
reply to post by Ploutonas

 

If you would please;
Define: "4th density", and "what" a dimension is.

If you would please respectfully define the "3rd density normality" and what if it is a dimension what is it, if lighter in frequency than the 3.0 or obligatory 3.3 would be somewhere within the 4th or 5th ranges? Can we wifi it frequency wise? Ive heard the 4D is not where you want to be as it is a NEGATIVE HOLDING ENERGY PLATFORM. Dispersal central. What is it you require?

Sorry man; I'm an Old School Western Ceremonial Magician / Enochian metaphysicsist / Hardware / software engineer. The usage of the terms "density" and "dimension" as they seem to be used in "new age metaphysics" does not seem to hold any logic, rhyme, nor reason. If any One of you would care to properly define and name those terms I would be more than happy to apply what little expertise I have to the subject.

However, in all reality, I would that you simply made a modicum of sense.

reply to post by tanka418

Sorry man; I'm an Old School Western Ceremonial Magician

That is really cool. I studied Ancient Myan Wizardry for some time also.

ZetaRediculian
That is really cool. I studied Ancient Myan Wizardry for some time also.

I signed up for a weekend seminar in Neo-Peruvian Shamanism, but it turned out to be one of those timeshare scams.

tanka418
vethumanbeing
tanka418
reply to post by Ploutonas

tanka418
If you would please;
Define: "4th density", and "what" a dimension is.

veteranhumanbeing
If you would please respectfully define the "3rd density normality" and what if it is a dimension what is it, if lighter in frequency than the 3.0 or obligatory 3.3 would be somewhere within the 4th or 5th ranges? Can we wifi it frequency wise? Ive heard the 4D is not where you want to be as it is a NEGATIVE HOLDING ENERGY PLATFORM. Dispersal central. What is it you require?

tanka
Sorry man; I'm an Old School Western Ceremonial Magician / Enochian metaphysicsist / Hardware / software engineer. The usage of the terms "density" and "dimension" as they seem to be used in "new age metaphysics" does not seem to hold any logic, rhyme, nor reason. If any One of you would care to properly define and name those terms I would be more than happy to apply what little expertise I have to the subject.
However, in all reality, I would that you simply made a modicum of sense.

Obviously you know me as my senses are not of the modality/type you might be used to. So you are an enochian magickian? Nuit-space and Hadit all possibilities affecting it diviner manipulator of the Law of Thelema? I would not call myself new school metaphysics/new age dabbler. Density would be a term you throw out? Dimension as well? As I understand dimensions: they exist of sound and light frequency differencials. Are you living in the dense matter gross form of 3 dimensionality typing away on a keyboard? I would guess you are.

vethumanbeing
Obviously you know me as my senses are not of the modality/type you might be used to. So you are an enochian magickian? Nuit-space and Hadit all possibilities affecting it diviner manipulator of the Law of Thelema? I would not call myself new school metaphysics/new age dabbler. Density would be a term you throw out? Dimension as well? As I understand dimensions: they exist of sound and light frequency differencials. Are you living in the dense matter gross form of 3 dimensionality typing away on a keyboard? I would guess you are.

Yes, I'm sure you would guess something like that; you could be wrong.

While I may have some issues with the kind of "word salad" batted around by the "new age" types, I'm not without understanding, nor am i incapable of quickly analyzing new idea.

for your reading pleasure ...

I'm also happy to see that you understand Thelema so well . . .geh!