Miss leading Polls

I just read an Article on the Polls on why and why not we should attack Syria
Polls

This concerns me on a few levels, first all the Polls in the past which were stated from any where between 73% to as high as 92% don't agree that we (the US)should be involved.

MSN must be in bed with the W.H., Why on the eve of that guy's speech on why we should be attack Syria are the Poll results so much different.

Even the ATS Poll shows a less than 10% for an Attack.

I believe no matter what the people say, that guy is going to do what ever he wants and he is going to drag us down a road that we can not afford in any fashion.

19KTankCommander
I just read an Article on the Polls on why and why not we should attack Libya's
Polls

This concerns me on a few levels, first all the Polls in the past which were stated from any where between 73% to as high as 92% don't agree that we (the US)should be involved.

MSN must be in bed with the W.H., Why on the eve of that guy's speech on why we should be attack Libya are the Poll results so much different.

Even the ATS Poll shows a less than 10% for an Attack.

I believe not matter what the people say, that guy is going to do what ever he wants and he is going to drag us down a road that we can not afford in any fashion.

No body is polling on invading Libya, we did that already.

????

reply to post by OneManArmy


I am not asking about doing a poll I am saying that MSN poll is out of wack

19KTankCommander
reply to post by OneManArmy

 

I am not asking about doing a poll I am saying that MSN poll is out of wack

Eh?

The world is talking about Syria, and you are talking about Libya.

Is it me thats confused or you? Or both of us?

reply to post by OneManArmy


Thanks, I was just reading a think about Syria, Correct my Mistake, still same part of the world, but I guess the say "Only close counts in Horse Shoes and Hand grenades"