It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DancedWithWolves
Oh look! Yea! ATS sent a mod into the Part 2 thread to finally tell us where the Part 1 thread is hiding. Right? Crickets.
Sits and waits...and waits...and waits.
Not a lot of credibility flowing...you know? Sad.
Peace to the fellow posters.
originally posted by: StonedSheep
Very sad that part 1 has gone walkies. That's all I have to say really.
Still, big thanks for all the info and effort you guys put in. One day the truth will out.
Particulate pollution in the past decade has been measured as PM10, that is particulate matter 10 microns in diameter or less, which is talcum powder size. Recently the focus has shifted to smaller diameter particles, PM2.5, which denotes all particles 2.5 microns and smaller (bacteria sized). These small sizes are thought to be more injurious because they are deeply respirable, becoming lodged in the farthest recesses of the lungs. Smoke from wood combustion is almost entirely in this range.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Silverlok
Those would be generated through galvanic transport would they not?
Iirc.
...
originally posted by: fakedirt
a reply to: Silverlok
for clarity tepco ideas. I haven't found any contingencies suggested by the guardians of the downright dangerous deluge draining dedecontamination.
f