It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darth_Prime
let me start by saying i don't agree with it
now, there was recently a topic about a photographer refusing to take pictures of a Lesbian wedding because she didn't believe in same sex marriage, earlier there was a topic about a Cake shop refusing to make a celebration cake for a Gay couples wedding, in both those topics multiple people said the store has the right to refuse service and it's not discrimination, and the Couples were pushing an agenda by taking legal action etc
Originally posted by tadaman
reply to post by AthiestJesus
who is telling you to worship him?
IN fact I havent seen one iota of "troops worship". Most people just stated the laws, their take on respecting them, and or if they would personally respect the laws or not.
Your knee jerk reaction to assume that anything about the military is out of a simple minded patriotism is insulting to say the least.
This is literally a thread about a Veteran and his disability. End of story. What did you expect? Pillow talk about our favorite 80´s cartoons?
Originally posted by AthiestJesus
Whilst I agree that this is pathetic of the owner , I need to point out that I do not like the way I`m having this man`s service background slammed in my face as if he is more important than anyone else simply because he was in the forces . Obviously written that way to stir up emotions and "rally the troops" , a shame really because the story is big enough without the whole "patriot" string pulling routine .
Originally posted by tadaman
reply to post by AthiestJesus
SOO
this is NOT about a veteran whose nature of disability is PTSD? And the Dog was NOT assigned to him as part of his treatment?
because I could have sworn that that is EXACTLY what this is about. That the law still applies to him and the reason why is everything I just stated, as stated in the OP....
If I am wrong then slap my ass and call me naughty. I thought everything mentioned was on topic and your little opportune rant about the sickening nature of "military praise" was not. (out of place, inappropriate)
Maybe you should keep your sickness and your tripe to yourself. No one cares about that. THAT is for sure.
edit on 28-8-2013 by tadaman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by matafuchs
What would be the difference if it was left out that he was a veteran? How could it make any difference? It is just laying the groundwork for why he has the dog. So if he was blind it would be different to some of you.
This is not about what he may have went through, or what he had to do in the service or why. It is about human beings being civil to one another. Plain and simple. Compassion. Putting yourself in someone elses shows and not being a schmuck.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by AthiestJesus
So different rules apply to veterans than to civilians. Got it.
Sorry, doesn't work that way. Whether he is a veteran or not, the ADA applies to all people that have service animals. The restaurant was wrong, and they broke the law kicking him out over his dog.
If they left out his background they would have a story , but all they have here is gossip about a veteran.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by AthiestJesus
If they left out his background they would have a story , but all they have here is gossip about a veteran.
So why is it that since he's a veteran it's just "gossip about a veteran" and not a story?