It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
President Obama signaled in an exclusive interview with radio hosts Tom Joyner and Sybil Wilkes that Martin Luther King Jr. would have liked his health care plan for Americans.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by BritofTexas
Originally posted by Indigo5
reply to post by butcherguy
WWJD?...What Would Jesus Do?....You can claim that anyone that risked trying to answer that question is decietful?
Again it seems petty, but have at it..
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by Indigo5
reply to post by butcherguy
WWJD?...What Would Jesus Do?....You can claim that anyone that risked trying to answer that question is decietful?
Again it seems petty, but have at it..
You mean the Jesus that is referenced in a book? The book that has the Jesus chapters that were written generations after he died?
I don't know what he would do either.
Originally posted by n00bUK
Martin will be turning in his grave knowing he is been used for ideas that are totally unrelated to his cause.
We had income tax for 34 years...1861-1895..then no income tax for the following 18 years until 1913.
The origin of the income tax on individuals is generally cited as the passage of the 16th Amendment, passed by Congress on July 2, 1909, and ratified February 3, 1913; however, its history actually goes back even further.
During the Civil War Congress passed the Revenue Act of 1861 which included a tax on personal incomes to help pay war expenses. The tax was repealed ten years later.
However, in 1894 Congress enacted a flat rate Federal income tax, which was ruled unconstitutional the following year by the U.S. Supreme Court because it was a direct tax not apportioned according to the population of each state.
The 16th amendment, ratified in 1913, removed this objection by allowing the Federal government to tax the income of individuals without regard to the population of each State. For additional information on taxation in the United States, see the section on taxes on the web site of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
History of the US Income Tax
By applying the Great Seal of the United States to the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, Knox certified that the requisite number of states had provided Congress with the “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States and without regard to any census or enumeration.”
Almost two decades before the amendment was ratified, the Supreme Court had struck down the 1894 law that instituted the first peacetime national income tax. In a decision that shocked most legal experts and social reformers, a slim majority of the court in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. ruled that taxing income violated the “direct tax clause.”
According to the Constitution, direct taxes needed to be apportioned among the states based on population -- meaning that a state’s population determined how much it owed in direct taxes. Reversing almost a century of legal precedent, the court ruled that because the 1894 tax wasn’t apportioned by population it was unconstitutional.
Many conservatives applauded the decision. For them, an income tax was the first step toward class warfare and “creeping socialism.” In his concurrence in Pollock, Justice Stephen J. Field expressed the anxieties of many elites at the time. “The present assault on capital is but the beginning,” he warned. “It will be but the stepping-stone to others, larger and more sweeping, till our political contests will become a war of the poor against the rich; a war constantly growing in intensity and bitterness.”
Field’s remarks came amid tremendous labor strife. And his allusions to a war between the rich and poor fueled fears that an income tax would hurl American society down the slippery slope of socialist revolution. Yet progressive reformers turned to an income tax not to radically redistribute wealth but to pay for a modern industrial state in a fair and effective manner
in fact the 1913 bill was a swap between tariff reform and income tax.
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by neo96
Well, things were a bit different back then. Simpler.
Now?
Big Government controlling every aspect.
I think MLK would have been disgusted that minorities, Americans in general are living the way they do. I think many Leaders from the past would echo it.
Originally posted by links234
MLK was a socialist and would've preferred a single-payer system.
That doesn't stop anyone from taking Obama's comment out of context though.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by BritofTexas