Anybody ever notice the Shemhamphorasch is constructed entirely from the reduced Fibonacci series ?

The Shemhamphorasch is known as the " Explicit name of God ".

It has exactly 216 letters between all three verses ( Exodus 14:19-21 )

Each verse ( 3 verses ) has the middle 1/3rd written backwards ( Boustrophedon form ) to produce the sequence of 216 numbers.

The entire sequence of 216 numbers, is produced with the reduced Fibonacci series, which is a 24 digit number that repeats infinitely, when any Fibonacci numbers are reduced to single digit values.

Ie;, any Fibonacci number, like F_12 ( 144 ) added and reduced down to single digit value = 9

It matters not which particular Fibonacci numbers are reduced, you could take the first million Fibonacci numbers and add and reduce them, and it will give you the same 24 digit repeating series.

The 24 digit series = ( 1 1 2 3 5 8 4 3 7 1 8 9 8 8 7 6 4 1 5 6 2 8 1 9 ) is multiplied by the numbers 1 - 9 to produce each additional row, ie; the 24 digit number multiplied by 2 and reduced as described, produces the 2nd line in the series. ( 2 2 4 6 1 7 8 6 5 2 7 9 7 7 5 3 8 2 1 3 4 7 2 9 ) Multiplication of the series by 3 produces the 3rd line in the series ( 3 3 6 9 6 6 3 9 3 3 6 9 6 6 3 9 3 3 6 9 6 6 3 9 ) and so on.

Following this simple rule produces the entire 216 digit series.

The Shemhamphorasch, like the Bible, and many other texts, both classic and modern, is chiastic in nature.

216 digits

Interestingly enough, 144,000 / 666 = 216.216216216216216..

reply to post by Soupornuts


Sounds like the film Pi:

en.wikipedia.org...(film)

Have you seen this thread:

Proof we were Created - Yes, I said Proof!
www.abovetopsecret.com...
by EnochWasRight
started on 8/24/2013 @ 09:22 AM

reply to post by Soupornuts

3541793328

Divided by:

5318008

=

666






5318008 Upside down looks like: Boobies!

Boobies are the devil?

Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by Soupornuts

 

Sounds like the film Pi:

en.wikipedia.org...(film)

Have you seen this thread:

Proof we were Created - Yes, I said Proof!
www.abovetopsecret.com...
by EnochWasRight
started on 8/24/2013 @ 09:22 AM

edit on 8/26/2013 by this_is_who_we_are because: typo

They do vaguely reference the Shemhamphorasch in the movie, however, the number show in Pi is not the same series.

The 3 verses, btw, are the 3 verses describing Moses parting the Red Sea.

I find it very odd that this consecutive 216 digit series is somehow encoded into these 3 verses, backwards by 1/3rds.

Not that boustrophedon is all that uncommon with ancient alphabets, in fact it's quite common, however, it's odd to me that observant Jews are supposedly forbidden from studying it.

Seems to make little sense, as it's " numerology/Kabbalah " , which you'd think would be right up their alley, no ?

Another odd bit of mathematical play:

216 * 666 = 143,856

143,56 + 144 = 144,000

I was always curious about the fact that the Kabbah Stone in Mecca is almost precisely 666 nautical miles from the Temple Mount, give or take a few feet.

While studying Quran verses, I happened to notice that Surat Al-Qamar (The Moon) is annotated using numbers which seem to be related to NT verses. This verse is supposedly pertaining to ' end times " events.

54:1 " The Hour has come near, and the moon has split [in two]. "

..ok..well..

The Moon's diameter = ~ 2160 miles

Half of that, the radius, = 1080 miles

144,000 / 666 = 216.216216216216216..

216 * 5 = 1080

1080 happens to be the isopsephy value of the Greek phrase " To Hagion Pnuema " ( The Holy Spirit )

Well, the two numbers 144,000 and 666 come from NT verses describing the " beast ".

The gematria value of the Hebrew word " beast " happens to be 540, ( not 666 like some seem to think )

144,000 / 540 = 266.66666666666666

The Moon is 27% the size of the Earth ( .27 )

72 / 27 = 266.66666666666666

As 540, 216, and 1080 all happen to be measurements of Lunar dimensions, yet both books, ( The Quran and the Bible ) use these numbers, which pertain to the same exact things, I am curious how this is true, as it seems to not be a statistical anomaly, ie " numerology ".


?

Originally posted by boncho
3541793328

Divided by:

5318008

=

666

5318008 Upside down looks like: Boobies!

Boobies are the devil?

edit on 26-8-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)

.....jeez, idk, maybe try shoving the crayon further up your nose.....

reply to post by Soupornuts


As I sit at my key pad, find my self in a quandry.

If I completely ignore such drival, will it simply go away or will it continue to spread and force me to find other forums in which to become involved?

Originally posted by Soupornuts

Originally posted by boncho
3541793328

Divided by:

5318008

=

666

5318008 Upside down looks like: Boobies!

Boobies are the devil?

edit on 26-8-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)

.....jeez, idk, maybe try shoving the crayon further up your nose.....

Was the OP equation created with crayons?

Originally posted by teamcommander
reply to post by Soupornuts

 

As I sit at my key pad, find my self in a quandry.

If I completely ignore such drival, will it simply go away or will it continue to spread and force me to find other forums in which to become involved?

Truthfully I don't really care.

Why do you ask ?

Originally posted by boncho

Originally posted by Soupornuts

Originally posted by boncho
3541793328

Divided by:

5318008

=

666

5318008 Upside down looks like: Boobies!

Boobies are the devil?

edit on 26-8-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)

.....jeez, idk, maybe try shoving the crayon further up your nose.....

Was the OP equation created with crayons?

Funny, I'd think somebody who calls themselves a " writer " would recognize chiastic structures.

Do you only have inane babbling in your arsenal of literary witticisms, or can you focus on the material presented and perhaps conjure up something intelligent to say ?

reply to post by Soupornuts

Funny, I'd think somebody who calls themselves a " writer " would recognize chiastic structures.

Do you only have inane babbling in your arsenal of literary witticisms, or can you focus on the material presented and perhaps conjure up something intelligent to say ?

1. I didn't name myself writer, the site did, I am but a simple minded poster.

2. I would give you credit for fictional works.

3. People like to find patterns and attribute numbers to things.

4. I would not give credit to people rehashing bible codes.

5. I have a fondness for the numbers I posted, as well as for boobies.

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by Soupornuts

Funny, I'd think somebody who calls themselves a " writer " would recognize chiastic structures.

Do you only have inane babbling in your arsenal of literary witticisms, or can you focus on the material presented and perhaps conjure up something intelligent to say ?

 

1. I didn't name myself writer, the site did, I am but a simple minded poster.

2. I would give you credit for fictional works.

3. People like to find patterns and attribute numbers to things.

4. I would not give credit to people rehashing bible codes.

5. I have a fondness for the numbers I posted, as well as for boobies.

edit on 26-8-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)

Your " credit " is moot to me, I only have interest in the literary structure of the books and math used, not their validity in respect to your religious beliefs or mine.

I'm really more interested in how this was encoded in fractions BACKWARDS in the language, and also knowing why it's in the Bible in the first place, when the mathematical series most certainly predates Fibonacci, who was incorrectly attributed with discovering the Fibonacci series after studying in North Africa.

I doubt that Moses parting the Red Sea was a literall event, and I also highly doubt that this mathematical series didn't exist previous to the supposed time of the Biblical Exodus, so it's placement in the Bible is highly suspect.

In addition to that, the abbreviation " YHWH " is used for the acrostic form of the Shemhamphorasch, while the 3 verses are re-written in Boustrophedonic transforms.

" YHWH/LORD " is only used over 6,000 times in the Bible, it's not like anybody should know that though, especially because it's primary use is only referencing the Tetragammaton, which the Jews are forbidden from saying, instead substituting " Adonai ".

Not like anybody should actually know about the things they think they are skeptical of, god forbid.

/sarcasm off

Yes, you make a good point. I found a pattern and a structure.

There it is.

Plain as day

Mathematically chiastic just like most of the Bible is literately chiastic.

..yeah......" biblecode " is a moniker tossed out by people who have trouble comprehending things like chiasmus and heptadic structures, but thank you for your uninformed opinion.





thank you, come again

reply to post by Soupornuts

I'm really more interested in how this was encoded in fractions BACKWARDS in the language, and also knowing why it's in the Bible in the first place, when the mathematical series most certainly predates Fibonacci, who was incorrectly attributed with discovering the Fibonacci series after studying in North Africa

No one would know or be able to put in an informed opinion since you did not post the source material. It helps when threads are sourced, as the conversation then becomes based on something.

There are plenty of threads created daily lacking sources, they all suffer the same end.

Originally posted by teamcommander
reply to post by Soupornuts

 

As I sit at my key pad, find my self in a quandry.

If I completely ignore such drival, will it simply go away or will it continue to spread and force me to find other forums in which to become involved?

Pretentious butt comes to mind...

While the sentiment of frustration might exists when some try to....creatively apply "maths" to discern Jesus's return date or something else, this isn't similar to the others in that regard. Fact is esoteric texts do contain these types of things.

The Great Pyramids were thought to be designed with astronomical measurements in mind, if stone can hold hidden information, certainly not too much of a stretch to think texts can.

As demonstrated by your post, I can't say there'd be much of a loss if you found a more "homely" forum for yourself.

reply to post by Turq1


I'll do this from time to time depending on the thread:

3 - System, 33 - Truth

A few posts down

The Phi spiral describes the surface of the torus, the basic element of matter. Now if we put the Phi spiral inside a tetrahedron and then slowly revolve it around a pivot axis, and shine a light from behind the Phi spiral, all of the Hebrew characters will show up as the shadows on the inside face of the tetrahedron. Hence, the characters of the Hebrew alphabet are the projections of a Golden Mean spiral.

Source

This quote seems to clearly explain the significance of the ratio 3:6:9 - The relative frequency of all sympathetic streams is in the ratio 3:6:9. Those whose relative frequencies are 3:9 are mutually attractive, while those having the relation of 6:9 are mutually repellent.

Source

Here are the dissections of the entire series, so you can see how it's constructed.

biblebynumbers.wordpress.com... e-shemhamphorasch/

biblebynumbers.wordpress.com... e-shemhamphorasch/

and of course, a tasty video

www.youtube.com...

Please accept that I know nothing about numerology, you could easily persuade me that a Shemhamphorasch is a Gaelic automobile brand, and that a reduced Fibonacci series is one made with less sugar.

Looking solely at the OP, I am left with two questions.

1)

It has exactly 216 letters between all three verses ( Exodus 14:19-21 )

The entire sequence of 216 numbers, is produced with the reduced Fibonacci series, which is a 24 digit number that repeats infinitely, when any Fibonacci numbers are reduced to single digit values.

Doesn't a letter require two digits to represent? They must have used more than ten letters. So if the Fiboncci series produces 216 numbers, wouldn't that equate to 108 letters?

2) Let us assume that the Shemhamphorasch is constructed entirely from the reduced Fibonacci series. Ok, now what? I mean, if it is, so what? What is the significance displayed here? In short, why should anyone care?

OP-- your idea sounds very interesting, and I want to understand it, but I don't think I do....


I'm not sure if it's just my own ignorance, or that I haven't had enough coffee today, or if it's the particular way you explained it, or if it's just way above my head.


I am pretty intelligent-- but sometimes certain peoples' writing styles don't seem to work with my style of comprehending, if that makes sense to you. And math hurts my head a bit. But after reading the thread, I'm still confused as to how you're relating the numerical sequence to the "unspoken" name of god...?

reply to post by charles1952


Because the Fibonacci Sequence is basically a numeric code found in biological life. The awareness of it is quite old with the oldest representation of it being within Sanskrit and the work of Pingala, who lived between 400 and 200 B.C. If the OP did actually get those numbers from the text, it'd be pretty interesting. However, I'm no expert on Hebrew other than knowing that the 9 letters of the alphabet are used to make numbers and, kind of not surprised, but I couldn't find the Shem HaMephorash in Hebrew online to give it a stab. Apparently, putting the explicit name of God onto a website must not be kosher. Zero chance of verifying.

If the OP is correct, what it would mean is that it could predate Pingala, depending on the age of the Shem HaMephorash and it'd be kind of neat to see this natural code embodied in that particular term. I'm an atheist but it'd be cool, taking consideration of the idea that god is "everywhere", to see this specific sequence cropping up in the name of a god. Then again, I'm a Fibonacci fan so I'm biased.

Proof that Jesus lived.

Oh, and guess what 6×6×6 equals?