It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In a phone call that lasted 40 minutes, the two leaders are understood to have concluded that the regime of Bashar al-Assad was almost certainly responsible for the assault that is believed to have killed as many as 1,400 people in Damascus in the middle of last week. Cameron was speaking from his holiday in Cornwall. The prime minister and US president said time was running out for Assad to allow UN weapons inspectors into the areas where the attack took place.
What is Bashar al Assad hiding? The world is demanding an independent investigation of Wednesday’s apparent CW attack. Immediately.
Otherwise, we’ll all conclude that Assad is guilty and lying-again.
"It's an active war zone in Damascus," said Kennedy, who has gained extensive experience managing U.N. humanitarian operations in the world's deadliest trouble spots over the past 20 years. "I was there a few months ago: you hear every day impacts, shells, there might be 10 in a day, you might hear 80 in a day. You can see airstrikes, you can see artillery. You get shot at, I was only there for 3 and ½ days as a visitor and my car was shot, we were shot at twice," including once by an unidentified sniper.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
A source in Damascus has told he lives in the area where the alleged chem attack occurred he has stated he doesn't remember nor hasn't seen any SAA forces movements in the alleged area of the attack. The SAA forces weren't there at the time of the supposed attack.
Is there anyone falling for this amateur hour crap any more?
Originally posted by MysterX
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
A source in Damascus has told he lives in the area where the alleged chem attack occurred he has stated he doesn't remember nor hasn't seen any SAA forces movements in the alleged area of the attack. The SAA forces weren't there at the time of the supposed attack.
Being reported on RT news that the Syrian army has discovered a 'rebel' chemical weapons factory on the outskirts of Damascus, complete with empty shells and rockets waiting to be filled with poison gas.
Strike two for the terrorists and the 2nd time the so-called rebels have crossed Mr. Obama's 'red-line' for chemical weapons.
Strange that when he accuses Syrian regulars of using chemical weapons it's 'a red line' that can only mean war...when the terrorists they are arming and equipping get caught preparing chemical weapons, Obama sends them more arms and supplies...i'm not going to even bother mentioning Israel and White Phosphorous unloaded on the civilians in Gaza not too long ago...except to say that the red line sound bite wasn't much in evidence then either.
Is there anyone falling for this amateur hour crap any more?
*is RT a trustworthy news source? or is it the Putin network?
Russian authorities should conduct a sufficiently thorough investigation to identify the killers of a prominent Dagestani journalist and hold them to account.
Akhmednabi Akhmednabiev, who died of multiple gunshot wounds on July 9, 2013, was deputy chief editor of a leading independent weekly in Dagestan, Novoe Delo (New Action). He was also a regular contributor to the Caucasian Knot online portal and other media outlets. Akhmednabiev is the second journalist covering counterinsurgency issues murdered in less than two years in Dagestan.
“For many years Akhmednabiev courageously reported on abuses and lawlessness in Dagestan, Russia’s most intense hot spot,” said Tanya Lokshina, Russia program director at Human Rights Watch. “His brazen murder cannot but relate to his work in journalism.”
I agree with Wrabbit. I liked Clinton quite a bit. He could charm the pants off a mannequin.
It would seem to me that the only journalists in Russia that can speak freely are those who speak for Putin. Anyone else needs to watch their back if they even dare to speak the truth.
Oh, and just out of curiosity why are so many people wiling to accept what Syria's state news service tells them?
Mr Cameron also spoke to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper who was in agreement that "the international community must respond appropriately", Downing Street said.
Originally posted by Thorneblood
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
Russia's dark history is pretty well documented, but i suppose since it isn't some anti-america rant then it just doesn't matter much.
Every President has at least one bad war to deal with, but for me Clinton is still the most charming.
No i don't really trust Al-jazeera, and i was aware of Turkey's record with journalists. However since neither of those deal with RT being less then credible why would i bring it up?
Look like the PM of Canada agrees as well....how nice that you left that out.
Guess we should ignore it since it doesn't fit into your rantings tho?
BBC
Mr Cameron also spoke to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper who was in agreement that "the international community must respond appropriately", Downing Street said.
No i don't really trust Al-jazeera,
However since neither of those deal with RT being less then credible why would i bring it up?
Look like the PM of Canada agrees as well....how nice that you left that out. Guess we should ignore it since it doesn't fit into your rantings tho?