It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Deetermined
Can Buddhism be considered spiritual? In my opinion, it's considered more of a philosophy, since it focuses more on thoughts than an actual separate spiritual life.
Originally posted by NiNjABackflip
reply to post by Itisnowagain
The Buddha knows nothing and nothing is spirit.
You seem to be dancing around the bush with your strange "nothing", assuming wrongly that we know what you're talking about. Does this statement have any meaning? Or are you saying Buddha is nothing and spirit is nothing?
Originally posted by NiNjABackflip
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Then why aren't you making yourself understandable? You are saying things are nothings, when the opposite of the case is true.
Originally posted by filledcup
aahhahaha
mischievous itisnowagain..
nothing does not exist
nothing is something
i know nothing
i know something is there where there is nothing
nothing exists
nothing is nothing
hahaha naughty naughty. i await to see who gets to wrap their mind around it first.
there is no nothing. knowing nothing is to know that it is not nothing. w00t
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by NiNjABackflip
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Then why aren't you making yourself understandable? You are saying things are nothings, when the opposite of the case is true.
Because a Buddha will always be misunderstood - watch the video.
Originally posted by filledcup
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by NiNjABackflip
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Then why aren't you making yourself understandable? You are saying things are nothings, when the opposite of the case is true.
Because a Buddha will always be misunderstood - watch the video.
lol it is so simple. perspective is the double edged sword. how can opposing perspectives be true they ask.
Because a Buddha will always be misunderstood - watch the video.
The first line is -
Your society teaches you to be blind because the society needs blind people because they make good slaves.
Who are 'they'?
the ones on the thread and others who cant perceive what ur trying to tell them.
Originally posted by NiNjABackflip
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Because a Buddha will always be misunderstood - watch the video.
The first line is -
Your society teaches you to be blind because the society needs blind people because they make good slaves.
There is no way to make sense of what you're getting at. You have derailed the thread.
Originally posted by NiNjABackflip
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Because a Buddha will always be misunderstood - watch the video.
The first line is -
Your society teaches you to be blind because the society needs blind people because they make good slaves.
There is no way to make sense of what you're getting at. You have derailed the thread.
Originally posted by NiNjABackflip
reply to post by filledcup
the ones on the thread and others who cant perceive what ur trying to tell them.
It's easy to perceive. He said it many times himself, what he is trying to tell us is absolutely nothing.
Originally posted by NiNjABackflip
reply to post by Itisnowagain
I apologize. I thought you were talking about nothing. But now you are talking about spirituality. Two different concepts. I wasn't sure you were saying they are one in the same.