It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Federal employees in the Economic Development Administration smashed up $175,000 worth of usable computers, printers, televisions, and digital cameras after being warned by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that their IT system was infected with malicious malware.
But the destruction was based on “inaccurate information” and a series of blunders and miscommunications that wound up costing taxpayers a total of $2.7 million in unnecessary expenditures, or more than half of EDA’s 2012 IT budget, according to a 33-page report by the Commerce Department’s inspector general.
Besides spending $1 million to set up a temporary system, and another $688,000 for a “long term recovery solution,” EDA paid a cybersecurity contractor $823,000 to ferret out the malware.
Within two weeks, the cybersecurity experts concluded that the initial malware warnings were “false positives.” However, they “were unable to provide the assurance EDA’s Chief Information Officer sought, because doing so involved proving that an infection could not exist rather than that one did not exist,” the IG said.
In December 2011, the Department of Homeland Security notified both the EDA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that there was a possible malware infection within the two agencies' systems.
The NOAA isolated and cleaned up the problem within a few weeks.
The EDA, however, responded by cutting its systems off from the rest of the world—disabling its enterprise e-mail system and leaving its regional offices no way of accessing centrally held databases.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
So, we actually have people in management level positions within a Federal Agency that believe software based malicious programs require the physical destruction of everything from the whole computer box to the printers and monitors?
So, I'm assuming people have been promoted in the aftermath.
If congressmen and senators can believe it, why can't 15, 20, 25 year government employees believe it?
Originally posted by links234
reply to post by xuenchen
So you're of the belief that congress can be fallible but government employees can't be?
I hate to stereotype but it's the idea that some old people just don't get technology. That was the point of the post.
If congressmen and senators can believe it, why can't 15, 20, 25 year government employees believe it?
Originally posted by links234
reply to post by xuenchen
I had a feeling my typing wouldn't come across as intended. You've completely missed what I was trying to say. I'm sorry. Just pretend I didn't say anything at all.
I think I can still edit the post if you'd like me to erase it.
Originally posted by fnpmitchreturns
It was just equipment used to develop the program known as Obamacare......... so a reason was manufactured to destroy their evidence of corruption ...
this is a conspiracy site ...... or are they really that stupid?
EDA paid a cybersecurity contractor $823,000 to ferret out the malware.
Originally posted by neo96
EDA paid a cybersecurity contractor $823,000 to ferret out the malware.
I want a government contractor job.