It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The First Military Coup In the fall of 2012, it is now clear that President Obama survived an attempted military coup. My sources tell me, that Obama, is fully aware of the fact that key elements of the military want him gone as the President and, in response, Obama has secretly embedded his CIA operatives in various military command structures around the world by placing these operatives into executive command positions in order to help them prevent just such a military coup and these embedded forces have indeed served him well in the aftermath of Benghazi.
Often, these embedded operatives serve as the second-in-command. The sole purpose of Obama’s operatives is to keep watch on key military leaders and to prevent them from moving against the policies of the present administration. The murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens and his security detail at Benghazi served as a flashpoint for an attempted military coup. What is interesting about the coup attempt, is that very divergent military forces have joined together to take down Obama’s presidency. At issue was the attempted rescue of Ambassador Stevens by two senior military command officers.
The Middle East command structure of the American military was not on board with President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. Panetta is so unpopular with the troops, that when he visits Afghanistan, the troops must be disarmed prior to his landing because he has been fired upon before from American ground forces.
In the aftermath of the Benghazi massacre, two senior level command officers, General Carter Ham, the former commander of AFRICOM and Admiral Charles M. Gayouette were removed from the command positions and arrested by their executive officers. Do you remember that I previously said that Obama was embedding CIA operatives into the number two command positions in key military commands around the world? When Hamm was in the process of launching a rescue mission to save Stevens, General Rodriguez promptly arrested Hamm and assumed his position as the head of AFRICOM.
It appears the military does not like Obama, and the report alleges that when Panetta visited troops, they had to be disarmed before he landed because he had been fired upon in the past!
Originally posted by UnifiedSerenity
reply to post by boncho
Did you read the article? It goes into great detail. I am bringing it to ATS readers attention and respecting not just copy and pasting this article which I believe is not allowed. 20 Generals being fired is unprecedented! The fact that a congressman wrote a letter revealing we had military assets in the area of Benghazi that were stopped from helping and that 2 of the Generals had gotten troops ready to leave to help only to be ARRESTED for doing so!
You might not like the part I quoted, but the article laid out a lot of reasons to believe all is not going well between Obama and our Military. There is also a follow-up article about the The Perpetrators of the Coup Against Obama being headed up by right wing Carlyle Group!
So, what's really going on here? The Carlyle group is seeking to undermine Obama by releasing scandal after scandal. Now, I naturally think where there is smoke there is fire, and Obama is a puppet, but is the media ignoring facts like Panetta being shot at? Yeh, I'll just go dig that story up for ya! uh huh.edit on 11-8-2013 by UnifiedSerenity because: (no reason given)
A shocking Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (MTC) report red-lined to President Putin this morning warns that “various elements” within the US Military establishment are “actively planning” for the overthrow of President Barack Obama prior to the November elections.
According to this report, Russian Naval Infantry Forces commanders participating in Rim of the Pacific-2012 (RIMPAC) international naval war games off Hawaii (the world’s largest multi-national maritime exercise) this week were told by their US counterparts aboard the USS Port Royal (CG-73) that Obama had to be overthrown as he posed the most dangerous threat to the United States since the founding of their nation.
US Military commanders, this report continues, stated that American officers and soldiers, along with elected and appointed Federal government officials, all take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, of which they claim Obama is one due to his overturning of established law and constitutional precedents bringing their country to the brink of all-out civil war.
Coup and counter-coup in Washington
This year, a cabal of generals evidently believed it could secure the White House for Mitt Romney by staging the Benghazi incident and using it as the signal for a cold coup under cover of elections -- probably including computer-generated election fraud -- to bring down Obama. They guessed wrong.
The Night of the Long Knives The hatred of key members of the US officer corps for Obama was illustrated through the comments of Petraeus’ friend, the warmonger General Stanley McChrystal, who was ousted in June 2010. In addition to Petraeus, the following officers are also either sacked or the object of scandals or investigations:
I found the article full of facts. Now, seeing as you don't like the fact he has sources which he does not name, I did a little digging that took the search term "was there an attempted coup of Obama in 2012" and got this article:
Originally posted by UnifiedSerenity
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
Ok, so you throw away any story the EU times links to is that it? That is quite a good lil trick to use if someone wants to pull a disinfo op. I mean, just get alex jones to talk about it and thus there cannot be any truth to it, so "Next, move along, nothing to see here".
U.S. Marines waiting for Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to speak at Camp Leatherneck in Afghanistan Wednesday were ordered to leave the room and place their weapons outside.
Panetta arrived in Afghanistan Wednesday for a two-day visit amid heightened tensions after an American soldier allegedly killed 16 Afghan civilians in their homes Sunda
Gurganus later told reporters the decision had nothing to do with the weekend shooting, and said it was because the Afghan soldiers in attendance were unarmed and he did not want them treated differently than the Marines.
Several Marines said they had never seen a situation like this, although they do not believe the decision resulted from any security concerns. The senior defense official said Gurganus was under orders to make partnership a priority, and he felt that "it wouldn't be right to have armed Marines sitting next to unarmed Afghan soldiers. He wants to promote the mission of partnership."
At some bases, troops entering mess halls are required to remove the clip from their weapon and clear any rounds from the chamber. The senior defense official also said security has been increased in varying degrees in the past month or so, following the Quran burning. For example, in Kabul, as recently as seven days ago troops were required to carry their weapons everywhere, with the ammunition clip loaded but no round chambered, the official said.
Originally posted by boncho
And even dismissing all that, your newest source, which I read from beginning to end, I still haven't found any evidence to back up the first claim in your OP.
And seeing as you can't source the actual information yourself. I assume you haven't read your own "articles".
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by UnifiedSerenity
But there is no evidence other than an anonymous source that Panetta was ever shot at by US troops, or anyone else for that matter. So where's the proof of that to start with.