It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Jerusalem District Court has ruled that the state failed to prove that the tablet was a fake, paving the way for the defendant, antiquities collector Oded Golan, to be cleared of most of the charges against him
The Jehoash Tablet comprises 15 lines of Hebrew text inscribed on a piece of tabular black stone. It records building repairs to the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem conducted by King Jehoash, who lived a century after Solomon himself had died.
According to the Bible, Solomon built the temple in the 10th century BC and it was destroyed in 586 BC by an invading Babylonian army under the command of Nebuchadnezzar. Before the appearance of the Jehoash Tablet, the temple had been known only from the Bible, but the repairs recorded by the inscription are described in the Bible, and thus the tablet is the first material evidence of the temple and of the truth of the Biblical account.
The Jehoash Tablet first appeared in 2001, when a private investigator acting on behalf of Israeli collector Oded Golan asked the Geological Survey of Israel to determine its authenticity. The Geological Survey analyzed the patina coating the tablet and its inscription, concluding that it was 2,300 years old, and that therefore the inscription must be authentic.
In 2003, the tablet was offered for acquisition to the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, but the museum wanted to know its full provenance and place of discovery. The tablet subsequently vanished from view.
The discovery in question was a chalk ossuary dating from the first century AD carrying the inscription in Aramaic “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus”.
Several scholars, including epigraphers and physical scientists, had examined the inscription and assured Shanks that it was genuine (Lemaire 2002).
Dubbed the “James Ossuary”, the identity of its owner was kept secret at first, but several newspapers soon revealed it to be Oded Golan, a Tel Aviv antiquities collector.
In March, 2003 police and IAA officers raided Golan’s apartment and other premises. They found him to be in the possession of the Jehoash inscription, which they seized, along with other documents and material.
They also discovered a large number of unregistered archaeological artifacts, and many artifacts in various stages of fraudulent manufacture (Silberman & Goren 2003, 26). In December 2004, Golan and four other people (Robert Deutsch, Refael Brown, Shlomo Cohen, Faiz el Amlah) were charged with forging artifacts or enhancing genuine artifacts with forged inscriptions (Shanks 2005).
The charges against three of the people were dropped though in May 2008 the trial of Golan and Deutsch was ongoing.
Numerous objects were named in the indictments, including the James Ossuary and the Jehoash inscription.
When police searched Golan's apartment they found a hidden workshop filled with tools and half made artefacts.
NARRATOR: There was this large dark stone - very like the stone used for the Temple of Solomon Inscription. Then there were these tools, including a drill and drill bits. And there were also boxes of soil that could be used in a fake patina. But what was most suspicious were the artefacts. Some were in the early stages of preparation, like this casting for a bronze statue. And some appeared finished, like these royal seals, or bullae.
The implications of this were immense. Collectors around the world have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for supposedly ancient seals, painted pottery shards and other artefacts that came through Oded Golan's associates.
Dozens of these items have now been examined by Professor Goren, and all have been revealed to be forgeries.
Police now suspect that artefacts made by the same team of forgers have found their way into leading museums around the world.
Over the course of seven and a half years, the court heard testimony from 130 witnesses, including dozens of Israel’s most prominent experts in geology, chemistry, microbiology and ancient scripts. In the end, Judge Aharon Farkash ruled that the state had failed to prove its case.
After the prosecution read Golan’s response, the state decided to withdraw its appeal and accept his exoneration. But it still wants the Supreme Court to instruct Golan to hand over the Jehoash Tablet at no cost. Even as a fake the state should have it, as an “item used in the commission of an offense,” the prosecution argues.
Originally posted by UmbraSumus
What do you make of the fact, that during the trail the Israeli prosecutor claimed that the inscription on the stone and the treatment of the tablet, had been carried out recently with the intention of deception. However, during the recent proceedings in the trail, the deputy state attorney continued to assert, that the inscription was recent but the stone itself was ancient. (The BBC documentary suggested a possible origin as a ballast stone-) I would imagine that they would be considered as artifacts.
Very strange indeed.
I bet several museums are a little bit nervous - I wonder what percentage of the worlds displayed "ancient artifacts" are fake ?
Originally posted by UmbraSumus
However, during the recent proceedings in the trail, the deputy state attorney continued to assert, that the inscription was recent but the stone itself was ancient. (The BBC documentary suggested a possible origin as a ballast stone-) I would imagine that they would be considered as artifacts.
Very strange indeed.
Originally posted by arpgme
Originally posted by UmbraSumus
However, during the recent proceedings in the trail, the deputy state attorney continued to assert, that the inscription was recent but the stone itself was ancient. (The BBC documentary suggested a possible origin as a ballast stone-) I would imagine that they would be considered as artifacts.
Very strange indeed.
It's not strange at all.
Most rocks on Earth is "old" so if you take an old piece of rock and carve an inscription the rock will be dated to be "old" while the inscription will be revealed to be "current", which is exactly what happened when they tested it.
It's a fake. I'm not sure how people can still say "if" even when it was proven. They are being naive.
Over the course of seven and a half years, the court heard testimony from 130 witnesses, including dozens of Israel’s most prominent experts in geology, chemistry, microbiology and ancient scripts. In the end, Judge Aharon Farkash ruled that the state had failed to prove its case.
Originally posted by marg6043
... the effect I can see here is how much money this Tablet will make for a museum when the faithful tourist pour into Israel to see it for themselves.
Originally posted by geobro
i remember watching this years ago and i would say 199 % fake but we are talking about a tribe that can wander in the wilderness for 40 years and not leave a bit of evidense to prove it .
but turns a blind eye to fakery that will put them where they were not
Originally posted by demongoat
I thought at least part of the inscription on the ossuary was proven fake?
It says something along the lines of "James brother of Jesus" on it' when the Jewish people don't carve names like that. They would carve James Ben Joseph if he was jesus's brother.
The ossuary was real but the inscription was fraudulent.
It could be the same for the new find, the object could be real but the inscription false or rewritten.