It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
With her two-year-old son, Xavier, in her arms, she had boarded the 108 Bannantyne bus home to Verdun around 10 p.m. after having spent five hours at the Montreal Children’s Hospital. She boarded the vehicle near Atwater Avenue and Ste-Catherine Street West.
She searched through her purse for $3 in change for the fare, but only came up with a $5 bill. She said she offered it to the driver, who refused because the fare machine doesn’t accept bills.
He warned her that failure to pay a fare could be bad news if the bus was to get inspected. Then the bus took off with Tantost and her son on board, while she clutched the $5 in her hand.
Two inspectors boarded the bus in Verdun at Bannantyne Street and Fourth Avenue, several stops before Tantost’s home. An employee of the STM later told her that it was purely a coincidence that the bus was inspected.
“I find that suspicious,” Tantost said.
Originally posted by VforVendettea
reply to post by snarky412
She should fight it.
It says right on the bill "for all debts public and private."
The bus driver took off that would be called kidnapping/abduction or some variation of it.
Tantost said she told the inspectors she would contest the fine, words that according to her were met with a laugh and a comment about how the only benefit of that would be the overtime the STM employee treating the file would earn.
The STM declined to comment.
Originally posted by snarky412
Even a passenger offered to pay her fare but they wouldn't accept that either.
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by snarky412
Even a passenger offered to pay her fare but they wouldn't accept that either.
Reading the comments on that article, its clear that the other passenger offered to pay *AFTER* she was busted for travelling without a ticket.
You cant do that.
Originally posted by snarky412
The woman who was fined had a $5 bill, well over the fare, but the driver refused to accept it.
Originally posted by snarky412
And yes, another passenger offered as well, but to no avail.
Originally posted by snarky412
She wasn't mooching for a free ride, she just didn't have the appropriate change.
Isabelle Tremblay, a spokesperson for the STM ... said that the ticket machines on STM buses were not equipped to take anything but coins. Montreal bus fare boxes do not accept bills.
And please, she was at the Atwater METRO where getting a bus ticket would have been easy as pie!
Incredulous. The bus driver warned her that if she stayed on the bus, she could end up fined. She chose to stay on the bus, now she is crying because she doesn't like the outcome of HER choice.
Originally posted by snarky412
Yet there was another woman with an invalid ticket and only received a warning.
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by snarky412
The woman who was fined had a $5 bill, well over the fare, but the driver refused to accept it.
Well of course the driver refused to accept it.
His job is to drive the bus, and that alone.
Originally posted by snarky412
And yes, another passenger offered as well, but to no avail.
Reading the comments on that article, its clear that the other passenger offered to pay *AFTER* she was busted for travelling without a ticket.
You cant do that.
Originally posted by snarky412
She wasn't mooching for a free ride, she just didn't have the appropriate change.
But also, it turns out from reading other people's comments that you dont have to buy a ticket on the bus. You can also buy them from ticket offices off the bus before you get on:
Originally posted by snarky412
Yet there was another woman with an invalid ticket and only received a warning.
This issue would not have gone away if the other woman got a fine as well.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I think the biggest shame here is that the article didn't name the driver. I don't mean to do anything illegal or harmful to the guy. Not at all. However, if he'd be named in the local paper then EVERY business he goes to for quite some time can insure *HE* follows every single little B.S. rule to the letter, and not a single deviation for any reason, at any time. Period.
In fact...how about he get a HOME inspection. Is every tag still on every pillow and mattress in his home?? Is every single detail of his home, car and property in PRECISE compliance to EVERY line of code which exists? People can get downright medieval on a jerk like this.
He wants to bust people's chops and tell another passenger they can't pay the fare of a lady with a child? Well heck with him. he ought to suffer the life of a person held to EVERY silly regulation life can throw on him. See how HE likes life when everyone else is a cruel little tyrant to HIM.
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by snarky412
Absurd...not to mention cruel punishment for the supposed infraction of not having "exact change". Bureaucrats that make these rules have no common sense as they can not allow for exceptions to the rule.
Originally posted by snarky412
ETA: I still agree with rigel4, the driver was an Ass Hat !!!!
Originally posted by CaticusMaximus
Originally posted by snarky412
ETA: I still agree with rigel4, the driver was an Ass Hat !!!!
Why Because he isnt willing to be a change machine to every person who knows the rules but thinks they can get a freebie cause they are them and the world revolves around them
The fine should only maybe be 25 dollars, though. 219 is ridiculous. However, how often does buses come by? I know around where I live the buses come every 8 minutes or something. She chose to take the risk, knowing she had not payed. There was no emergency, or extenuating circumstances. She just didnt feel like getting change at a store or something and waiting a couple more minutes.
She rolled the dice and lost.
edit on 8/3/2013 by CaticusMaximus because: (no reason given)