It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

George Zimmerman stopped by Texas police for speeding, had gun in car

page: 11
8
<< 8  9  10   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 3 2013 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by intrptr
 



And even though a suggestion or request it is as filled with as much intent as a dispatcher saying, "We don't need you to do that", right?

You have actually taken that out of context.
The moderator has the ability to Penalize with a TOC Violation and the deduction of points.

NOW, you tell me How in the Hell was George in ANY Danger of having his Points Reduced by Not heeding the Dispatcher.



posted on Aug, 3 2013 @ 03:57 PM
link   
reply to post by intrptr
 



Disagreeing with someone is not "attacking them".

yes, that is true, but the media is responsible for the hate that many feel towards zimmerman because of their bias.
remember this:

now what would be the difference in reaction if this juxtaposition was shown instead?



posted on Aug, 3 2013 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by roadgravel
 


A driver might be pulled over for 5 or 10 mph above the limit. More than that would probably get a ticket. Warnings usually go to those who are just above the limit. On Texas highways, many, many people drive 10 over. The police can't pull everyone over. I wouldn't be surprised if the out of state plate got him noticed and warned.

Good thing you don't write the laws.

Last reply here.


Just pointing out the way it is. Good luck pushing your police state.
edit on 8/3/2013 by roadgravel because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 3 2013 @ 09:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by ownbestenemy
 


Yes, as a free person, in the country that redefined free persons, George was capable to walk freely and even engage in conversation freely; confrontational or not;


Whats your point? He wasn't out for a stroll. He was "following" a "suspicious person". Thats entirely different.


Except he was out and about; it matters not what YOU think he was doing. Maybe we should have to seek State approval of our intentions of being out in public -- isn't that called something? Something misspelled here often -- oh that is right! Martial Law or some variant of it.

So regardless of how you have interpreted the data, Mr. Zimmerman was out and about. That is all. He wasn't out to "follow" someone -- that would me he left his residence (even then, who gives a flipping flying monkey's butt if he did) to engage in this weird behavior!



posted on Aug, 3 2013 @ 09:17 PM
link   
 




 



new topics

top topics
 
8
<< 8  9  10   >>

log in

join