It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To give its full name, tDCS stands for transcranial direct current stimulation. Transcranial simply means that the direct current (i.e. from a battery rather than the AC mains) is passed across a region of your brain. In the case of the Foc.us, the direct current passes between the cathode and anode, which are placed over your prefrontal cortex. Basically, by pumping electrons into your brain, your neurons, which communicate via spikes of electricity, become more excitable. This means that they can fire more quickly, improving your reaction time. Furthermore, when you remove the current, your neurons are imbued with additional neuroplasticity — in other words, they more readily make new connections, improving your ability to learn new skills
there could be some serious ethical considerations if tDCS becomes widespread. Should students be allowed to use tDCS to improve their studies or to pass exams? What about professional e-sports gamers? If one team starts using tDCS to improve their reaction time and actions per minute (APM), other teams will have no option but to start using it — unless tDCS becomes the electronic equivalent of doping and is quickly outlawed, of course
"These are powerful tools, and when we do these studies we have to consider the risk benefit analysis. I don't think we know enough about the long-term safety of these techniques to justify using them on the developing brains of children."
Originally posted by Bleeeeep
reply to post by goou111
Being religious, this kind of stuff scares me - not the device, but what God will do about it.
The device forces the adaptation and alteration of life in order to "improve" it. That notion, I assume, would piss God off...and what's it even for? To beat someone in competition?
I think we shouldn't force the adaptations of evolution in order to get what we want or think we need.
...just my thoughts.
Originally posted by WhiteAlice
Personally, this makes me intensely uncomfortable, especially in that it's marketed towards gamers, who generally tend to be younger. I can very easily imagine a few hundred teenage boys that would try this out for a chance to kill me in a game on a regular basis (champ gamer). It's not the thought of actually having some competition in a game that gives me trepidation, however, lol. It's the question of whether or not this product will be used in a safe manner or if it will be misused/overused--something which I could very easily see occurring knowing so many gamers.
I have to agree with Barbara Sahakian, a neuroscientist from Cambridge on this one:
"These are powerful tools, and when we do these studies we have to consider the risk benefit analysis. I don't think we know enough about the long-term safety of these techniques to justify using them on the developing brains of children."
www.bbc.co.uk...