Disgusting... cross dressing camp for children.

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic

If you want to be offended because boy's toys and clothes are generally dark colored,

I am certainly not offended, just pointing out something which is fairly obvious.
My son wears clothing that is a far cry from the examples that you have shown. You might need to get out more. My son does have and wears pink clothing.
You mentioned pink for girls and blue for boys. If it isn't pink... it's dark???? Please.

Is yellow a dark color if you find out that my son wears it? Because it was an example color in the girl clothing line that you provided.... yellow is found in the boys clothing section of the local Target store here.... so is it dark now too???

reply to post by Briles1207

Originally posted by Briles1207
Well in the context of this thread, I could still be right ;-)

That made me laugh! But no, I was born female and I'm all female.

reply to post by sk0rpi0n

Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
So what happens once the camp is over and the boy needs to head back to the real world, outside the camp? Do you suppose all those kids at the camp are now going to be magically safe from bullying and name calling....

No, but they'll know that there are other boys like them and they'll know that there's nothing WRONG with them. They won't be so impacted by the bullies' words and they'll gain strength from that and feel better about being who they are. And they'll look forward to the next time they go to camp. And they won't kill themselves at 15.

Now, this might sound like a radical idea... but if bullying and teasing is the real problem, then wouldn't it make better sense to send the bullies to a "compassion camp" of some sort?

I LOVE that idea! I think a combination effort would be even better! The only problem I see with that is getting the kids to agree to go in the first place - it would seem to be forcing them. Parents would have to agree that their kid is a bully. And in most situations I've seen, where the parents get involved, they are in denial themselves.

After looking around on the Internet, I see that kids' camps are taking on "bullying" themes and addressing bullying. And I know there are a lot of anti-bullying programs in schools, which are great.

reply to post by sk0rpi0n


You:Masses are being manipulated into accepting the unnatural as natural.
Again,something that you and I agree on.

reply to post by Sk8ergrl

You said that it isn't about religion and now you have confirmed that it always has been. What you call as unnatural is natural to other people.

Don't worry, I'll point it out when the masses are being manipulated into accepting unhealthy, high-cholesterol foods as "normal" and "healthy". Has nothing to do with religion.

But I'm sure many would argue that its "normal" and "healthy" and possibly even support a camp for people to stuff their faces with cholesterol packed junk... so they can be who they are and free from people telling them its unhealthy.

reply to post by sk0rpi0n

Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
Its about unsuspecting children and sadly, their parents... being manipulated into accepting an alternate lifestyle... which is what this whole thing basically is.

These kids aren't "unsuspecting". They are absolute in their desires to dress and act like a girl. What's wrong with accepting an alternative to the "norm", if there's nothing wrong with it?

the masses are being manipulated into accepting the unnatural as natural.

You judge this as "unnatural". I think you are mistaken. LGBT people have been around forever. It's very natural for a segment of any culture or society to be LGBT.

reply to post by sk0rpi0n
If they want to eat fatty foods then that's up to them. We should all worry about our own problems not other peoples. The saying comes to mind " stop being a nosey parker " lol. You should be happy with your own lives.

reply to post by butcherguy


Generally speaking, boys' things are dark as compared to girls' things. Take a look down the TOY aisles next time you're at the store. I actually thought they were talking about toys in the article until you mentioned clothes.

Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
Its about unsuspecting children and sadly, their parents... being manipulated into accepting an alternate lifestyle... which is what this whole thing basically is.

- So you think that the children are being preyed upon by parents with an agenda?
- Maybe YOU are being manipulated (by religion) into thinking that being homosexual is 'an alternate lifestyle' when in fact it's just a natural part of being part of life.

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic

Generally speaking

So you are generalizing.
So where am I so far off base here?

reply to post by butcherguy

Originally posted by butcherguy
So you are generalizing.

Of COURSE I'm generalizing. Looking down an aisle of clothes (or toys) will give you a GENERAL idea of the color schemes. I know that boys sometimes wear yellow and girls sometimes wear brown. I'm not an idiot. Looking down the boys' aisle and then glancing down the girls' aisle, you're going to notice that the boys' aisle is generally "darker". That's all the statement was about. Looking down the aisle implies generalizing. Jeez!

So where am I so far off base here?

About what? I didn't say you were off base. I was just talkin' with ya.

Originally posted by mamabeth
reply to post by sk0rpi0n

 

You:Masses are being manipulated into accepting the unnatural as natural.
Again,something that you and I agree on.

What a load of tripe.

Homosexuality is not un-natural, it is present in hundreds of animal species. Animal species are not converted into being gay, they display it as an instinct.

Im an not going to be pulled into this debate because in my experience, nobody wins, it just goes round and round.

We all reap what we seed. Bullying/Judging others for things that are not important to make them fit in a box that is uncomfortable. Humanity shows it de-evolved barbaric state again.

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic


Let's go back to my original point then.

“Parents who don’t have a gender-confirming 3-year-old who wants to wear high heels and prefers to go down the pink aisle in K-Mart and not that nasty dark boys’ aisle,”

It says.... 'nasty dark boys' aisle' .

I wonder why the word 'nasty' was necessary.

Do you see what I'm getting at there?

Are boys nasty? (generally speaking)

reply to post by butcherguy

Originally posted by butcherguy
I wonder why the word 'nasty' was necessary.

I'm sure it wasn't necessary. But when I was a 5-year-old girl and visited with my cousins, most of the boys' things were "nasty". Frogs, bugs, dirt, army men, guns, sticks, explosion noises, spitting, etc. Their hands were always dirty, they smelled and they played rough and I got hurt. It was "nasty".

I MUCH preferred playing inside (though sometimes with trucks) in the clean and bug-free area. I made cookies with my E-Z Bake oven and dressed my dolls in soft, clean clothes, played school and "Monkees" (we pretended to be the band).

I said in the beginning, they were speaking from a child's mind. A young boy, who feels like a girl, would naturally think of boys' things as "nasty", JUST as a young boy would think of girls' things as "fruity", "gross" or "prissy".

When you were a little boy, what might you have called girls' toys? What might you have said, if someone asked if you wanted a baby doll for Christmas? "EW! Gross!" maybe?

Originally posted by butcherguy
Are boys nasty? (generally speaking)

When you're a little feminine girl? Yep. Pretty much.

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic

When you were a little boy, what might you have called girls' toys? What might you have said, if someone asked if you wanted a baby doll for Christmas? "EW! Gross!" maybe?

To be honest, I never had any relatives ask me that. But I was known to have played with my older sister's Barbie dolls. She hasn't forgiven me for that.
The heads could not be put back on, due to the manner in which I removed them.

reply to post by butcherguy

Originally posted by butcherguy
To be honest, I never had any relatives ask me that.

But what MIGHT you have said if they did? Come on. Be honest. Or at least let me know you get the point of the word "nasty", now.

The heads could not be put back on, due to the manner in which I removed them.

I had four older brothers. I feel your sister's pain!

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic

I would have said 'NO! Ewww, gross.'
I am pretty sure.

The heads could not be put back on, due to the manner in which I removed them.

I can just imagine your mum saying to your dad on Christmas day... "I told you a chainsaw was not a good idea!!!"

Message to the OP, Skorpion, knowing your posting history, you should let the homosexuality hate issue go a little, you are starting to make yourself look ridiculous!

Kindest respects

Rodinus

Originally posted by mykingdomforthetruth
i think you watch too much tv it's clouding your judgement people homosexuality is wrong its wronger than wrong god set fire to 2 citys because of it

And I think your religious brain washing is clouding your judgement.

It doesnt affect you, so why get all bent out of shape about it?

Live and let live.

I leave you with a quote from Frankie Boyle:

"A man who lies with another man should be stoned, it helps thats all I'm saying"