Something strange going on or just remarkable coincidences?

Wars of The JewsIonreply to post by 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by swordwords

 

Do you believe that Jesus' Father was God? If so, how would you explain this verse:

John 4
24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.

The Father is the Holy Spirit while the Mother is the body or vessel of the Spirit. The church is not the body nor the Bride of Christ (consciousness), the Earth is the Bride of Christ and it is the body of God (Spirit).

The church is the whore and they stole the role of Mother Earth and erased her role from the Trinity. The real Trinity is Mother, Father, and Son, a.k.a. body, spirit, and mind.

Peter's name was Cephas, which means "rock" in Aramaic. Earth is a rock floating through space. Peter's name is a dead giveaway because he is the one who founded the church. He denied Jesus three times, showing he is a known liar, meaning his church's foundation is lies.

edit on 17-7-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)

Well, I consider “God” to be a lie, so in the literal sense of his name he is “spirit”, however, underneath he represents the physical. This is the “Mother Earth” issue again-feminine covering masculine-and it is the reason that Christians have made God equal to the Trinity. Also, the Gospel of John is also built upon the intentionally misleading interpretations of Philo of Alexandria, so the metaphoric relationships have been distorted beyond their normal complexity. "Truth" also has a hidden meaning that is almost entirely contrary to its real meaning so only "true truth" means real truth as we understand it.

For an indication as to the nature of John the Apostle, you should read Plato’s Ion. Ion was a “rhapsode” from Ephesus who supposedly was an interpreter of Homer, however, Socrates exposes his inability to accurately explain the works of Homer and it is eventually decided that Ion’s knowledge comes not from skill, but from “inspiration”. Philo claimed to be interpreter of Moses, but like Ion, he fails to provide a real interpretation, and therefore Philo was an “Ion” or “John”. Also, the name “Philo” means “friend” in Greek, and this idea can be represented in Hebrew as “marea’”, so Philo was also “Mary”. In other words, Philo was a hermaphrodite, and this is why Da Vinci gave John a feminine appearance in his Last Supper. The “tradition” that the Apostle John and Mary traveled to Ephesus after Christ’s death is based on the identification of John with Ion.

I suppose that it helps to understand why Philo did what he did. Christianity began as a form of Gnosticism in which the allegoric secrets of the Old Testament and other works were exposed which resulted in a “crucifixion” of the “Word”. Philo led a campaign of disinformation designed to distort, discredit, and even replace Gnostic interpretations. The Gnostics were also infiltrated by others such as Paul, and eventually the bulk of the Gnostics were converted to “Christians”. However, this story of how Christianity began was obviously unsatisfactory, so a cover story had to be created. This cover story was created by “interpretations” of Josephus’ works in which Peter represents the original story told by Josephus. (Note that there is also a similarity between the names Josephus and Cephus.) So the “rock” that the Church was built on, was the history penned by Josephus. Since Josephus fails to make any literal mention the Christians in his Wars of The Jews, Peter is portrayed as denying Christ.

reply to post by swordwords


Mate I Łøvé your user name.

SnF.

Nice thread.