It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by MindpurelyMind
The further we look out into space the further back in time we see, but by that standard what we are seeing is already gone.
The furthest known galaxy is 13.3 billion light years away. Furthest galaxy
Now, what I interpret that to mean is we are seeing the light of that galaxy from where is was positioned 13.3 billion light years ago. You are right, it is no longer there. Since that time is has been moving away (for millions and millions of years). If the universe is 14 billion years old, then how can that furthest galaxy be THAT far away?
Anyone, anyone, anyone?
Here ill try an analogy lets say you blow up a balloon on earth and take that balloon into a vacuum you will see it get considerably larger. Now picture the universe being compressed and its currently expanding in a vacuum its going to get much bigger.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by spy66
Using your image I added in white dots to represent galaxies. Now, if there had been a singularity wouldn't you think that we would have other galaxies moving alongside of us, instead of ALL of them moving away from us? The only glitch is Andromeda, but I'm told the only reason it is on a collision course with us is because of gravity pulling us together, so its direction and speed is irrelevant.
If a few galaxies were moving along at the same speed and direction as the Milky Way, THEN we could reverse their motion back to a singularity. As it stands now (minus Andromeda) EVERYTHING is moving away from everything else. In my mind this is not evidence of a single point of origin. Then again, what do I know?
The first part of the expansion is light.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by spy66
The first part of the expansion is light.
I'm confused? I've heard several times that the Big Bang was NOT a big fiery explosion, but rather a sudden release of all the material contained within the singularity. I thought 'light' didn't come into existence until the first sun was formed. Yes? No?
I thought 'light' didn't come into existence until the first sun was formed. Yes? No?
Originally posted by maryhinge
reply to post by jiggerj
How i see it is there is three theories right
1 big bang theory
2 brain theory
3 string theory
WELL i think its all three at once
heres how in my "little mind"
two or more membranes (brains) collide causing a bang of sorts and are forever entangled (string thingy)
just a thought
dont forget we are all universes (brains) of sorts
as my brain as its own big bang
YOU NEVER KNOW, well no one else as a clue it could be right.
edit on 8/6/2013 by maryhinge because: spell check
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by maryhinge
reply to post by jiggerj
How i see it is there is three theories right
1 big bang theory
2 brain theory
3 string theory
WELL i think its all three at once
heres how in my "little mind"
two or more membranes (brains) collide causing a bang of sorts and are forever entangled (string thingy)
just a thought
dont forget we are all universes (brains) of sorts
as my brain as its own big bang
YOU NEVER KNOW, well no one else as a clue it could be right.
edit on 8/6/2013 by maryhinge because: spell check
Are you mixing brain with brane? I'm pretty sure the brane you're talking about is short for membrane, not brain.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Hope I'm not rambling here. Can anyone make sense of this?
It's easy to imagine galaxies rewinding back into the big bang singularity, but we also know that the galaxies are NOT moving away from each other because of the force of the big bang. Galaxies are moving away because the space between them is filling in with dark energy. Now, take away the Big Bang for a minute and nothing is changed. The dark energy would keep filling in the space between the galaxies just as it is now. So, how do we know that all the galaxies would rewind into a singularity that started the whole universe? They could've been going in different directions and were caught up in the dark energy. How do we know the dark energy goes on throughout the entire universe?
If we could throw little plastic galaxies in random directions around the edge of a whirlpool (our universe in rewind), once they got caught up in the whirlpool, and if we were in one of those galaxies we would say, LOOK, the universe is rewinding itself, bringing all the material back into a singularity! But, we know that these little galaxies didn't originate from that single point because we threw them in there.
Am I making any sense at all?
So, is there really proof that the Big Bang happened at all?
Each point in the universe is experiencing the rest of the universe racing away from it as if that point where the Big Bang blast zone. And yet, no one ever realized that this mean that there was no specific blast point - meaning that there was no actual Big Bang blast. Ever.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by NorEaster
Each point in the universe is experiencing the rest of the universe racing away from it as if that point where the Big Bang blast zone. And yet, no one ever realized that this mean that there was no specific blast point - meaning that there was no actual Big Bang blast. Ever.
THANK YOU for understanding what I've been trying to explain! All the analogies used to define one singularity (melting butter, rubber band) will still lead back to a specific point, whereas the real universe shows us just the opposite.
Maybe if we imagined lassoing some of the galaxies and pulling them back in the direction from whence they came we would see that a singularity doesn't make sense. If we pulled galaxies back while standing in the Milky way, those galaxies would move in one direction, and then if we moved out to the furthest galaxy and pulled the galaxies back they would move in a different direction. This doesn't make for a single point of origin. Well, in my little mind it doesn't.
It is byond my understanding that you dont see how this expansion would lead back to one single point. It is practically in the Word it self. You People are mixing up Your preseptions. If the galaxies are expanding away from eachother equally no matter what Galaxy you choose. All the galaxies would also be equally closer if you reverse the expansion. If you reverse the expansion enough they will all interact With eachother at one single point.
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by NorEaster
Each point in the universe is experiencing the rest of the universe racing away from it as if that point where the Big Bang blast zone. And yet, no one ever realized that this mean that there was no specific blast point - meaning that there was no actual Big Bang blast. Ever.
THANK YOU for understanding what I've been trying to explain! All the analogies used to define one singularity (melting butter, rubber band) will still lead back to a specific point, whereas the real universe shows us just the opposite.
Maybe if we imagined lassoing some of the galaxies and pulling them back in the direction from whence they came we would see that a singularity doesn't make sense. If we pulled galaxies back while standing in the Milky way, those galaxies would move in one direction, and then if we moved out to the furthest galaxy and pulled the galaxies back they would move in a different direction. This doesn't make for a single point of origin. Well, in my little mind it doesn't.
It is byond my understanding that you dont see how this expansion would lead back to one single point.
It is practically in the Word it self. You People are mixing up Your preseptions.
If the galaxies are expanding away from eachother equally no matter what Galaxy you choose. All the galaxies would also be equally closer if you reverse the expansion. If you reverse the expansion enough they will all interact With eachother at one single point.
I know you didn't like the balloon analogy, but if you forget about the interior and concentrate on the surface it may help. The surface is of course 2-dimensional, so first try to imagine what happens in 2 dimensions.