It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by crazyewok
Originally posted by nake13
Originally posted by crazyewok
I see no need for a long draen out trial. Just dump em in front of a crown court with a jury and get it over with.
.
Even better,just dump them in front of Drummer Rigby's barracks,I'm sure that some of his friends would like a nice "chat" with them.
Everyone deserves a fair trial.
Once we start makeing exceptions we start down a slippery slope.
Its not like the jury is going to come back with anything but guilty.
Originally posted by nake13
Originally posted by crazyewok
Originally posted by nake13
Originally posted by crazyewok
I see no need for a long draen out trial. Just dump em in front of a crown court with a jury and get it over with.
.
Even better,just dump them in front of Drummer Rigby's barracks,I'm sure that some of his friends would like a nice "chat" with them.
Everyone deserves a fair trial.
Once we start makeing exceptions we start down a slippery slope.
Its not like the jury is going to come back with anything but guilty.
I fully accept that,as a supposed civilised society everyone should be equal in the eyes of the law,however,just occasionaly,it might be liberating to shake off the veneer of civilised behaviour and do what is right (from a natural justice standpoint).
1)Not trying to be an arse here, but "from a natural justice standpoint" what should be done about the millions of civlian deaths (not to mention the deaths of millions of children) that have occurred since WW2 as a direct result of western economic imperialism, resource grabs and illegal wars?
2)Does this "natural justice" apply only to those who act against the west, which is a direct consequence of our aggression, or does it apply to us as well?
Should this "natural justice" apply to those who took us into an illegal war, killed hundreds of thousands (at a low estimate), lied to western citizens about it, and basically used the lives of our forces and non combatants for what was in reality a resource grab?
Or does it only apply when it happens to "one of our brave heroes (to quote the propaganda)?
You can't have it both ways.
Would a muslim who grabbed a childs hand and put it on his crotch be let off, like the soldier was this week because it was "not sexual"?
Originally posted by whatzshaken
To me in the video it looks like "Michael Adebolajo", Mujahid Abu Hamza. drops a knife and attempts to strike the officer rather than shoot them.
Michael Adebowale is the one along the fence with the gun.
Originally posted by paraphi
Originally posted by whatzshaken
To me in the video it looks like "Michael Adebolajo", Mujahid Abu Hamza. drops a knife and attempts to strike the officer rather than shoot them.
Michael Adebowale is the one along the fence with the gun.
Michael Adebolajo was trying to become a martyr. Suicide by being shot by the police. He failed in that. Clearly the police were tasked to take prisoners, unlike their US cousins who would have filled them with lead!
I am sure if both handled the gun, then both can be charged with its possession. Shame the shooter also failed to obtain the martyrdom he wanted.
When these two started, I bet they did not think they would live the rest of their sorry lives at Her Majesty's pleasure. That's justice, in my book.
Regards