It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In a statement, the institution remained uniform contact with the ship "until it moved away from the exercise area and our Territorial Sea", specifically west of Antofagasta.[
The Chilean navy confirmed on Thursday the presence of a submarine "unknown" without specifying the origin of the ship, which was traveling outside the Chilean territorial waters to the west of the city of Antofagasta.
As reported by the institution in a statement on May 14 while conducting naval exercises, "antisubmarine sensors of our National Fleet, Submarine Force and Naval aircraft, sonar contact had an unknown submarine, he journeyed beyond our Sea Territorial, maintaining contact until he moved away from the exercise area and our territorial sea. "
They said that the ship was discarded pertenciera to a neighboring unit and next to it "gave knowledge to the relevant national authorities." /ex]
www.latercera.com...[editb y]edit on 23-5-2013 by Trueman because: (no reason given)
The Chilean navy confirmed on Thursday the presence of a submarine "unknown" without specifying the origin of the ship, which was traveling outside the Chilean territorial waters to the west of the city of Antofagasta.
As reported by the institution in a statement on May 14 while conducting naval exercises, "antisubmarine sensors of our National Fleet, Submarine Force and Naval aircraft, sonar contact had an unknown submarine, he journeyed beyond our Sea Territorial, maintaining contact until he moved away from the exercise area and our territorial sea. "
They said that the ship was discarded pertenciera to a neighboring unit and next to it "gave knowledge to the relevant national authorities."
The navy said that "according to international law establishes the Law of the Sea", only one unit of the submarine type "is entitled to transit submerged," without stopping or enter "to national waters.
Finally, the armed forces have stated that anti-submarine detection systems "sophisticated" and "highly trained" to detect these alarms.
Earlier there was speculation a foreign submarine, specifically of U.S. origin and nuclear propulsion, had entered territorial waters while exercises developed by the Navy.
At about PPD deputy and member of the defense committee of the House, Jorge Tarud, remarked in conversation with CNN Chile that "can not enter our territory any nuclear ship" and that would "highly serious".
On the other hand, and based on rumors that point, the deputy DC, Ricardo Rincon, told Canal 24 Horas that "northern border sector is highly delicate and sensitive and always has been part of the Navy and in general by the national defense, which is very articulate, very detailed coordination to fulfill treaties and land and maritime borders. "
The congressman said that "there have been some problems, but with boats tied to the fishery resource."
Originally posted by Tuttle
reply to post by Trueman
Someone probably just trying to get a look see of the Chilean naval excersis, I imagine the Chilean Navy is probably pretty pleased with itself picking up someones nuke sub getting to close. Cant imagine it being that shady, the nuke sub skipper was probably just bored.edit on 23-5-2013 by Tuttle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by pavil
No offense to the Navy of Chile, but i seriously doubt any major powers nuclear subs would have been detected by them. You are talking top of the line subs against very average detection abilities. They would only be detected if they wanted to be detected.
Perhaps someone here with some Submarine or ASW experience could shed light on that.
Originally posted by pavil
No offense to the Navy of Chile, but i seriously doubt any major powers nuclear subs would have been detected by them. You are talking top of the line subs against very average detection abilities. They would only be detected if they wanted to be detected.
Perhaps someone here with some Submarine or ASW experience could shed light on that.
Originally posted by Tuttle
Originally posted by pavil
No offense to the Navy of Chile, but i seriously doubt any major powers nuclear subs would have been detected by them. You are talking top of the line subs against very average detection abilities. They would only be detected if they wanted to be detected.
Perhaps someone here with some Submarine or ASW experience could shed light on that.
Dunno man, Chile have had a navy for hundreds of years, they buy subs from Germany with Exocet capability. They probably do spend quite a fair bit on ultra state of the equipment listening equipment because at the end of the day THATS JUST SMART.
Sure they only have 100 ships, but they probably like any other sensible country makes sure they can protect there borders regardless.edit on 23-5-2013 by Tuttle because: (no reason given)
This could have been anyone's sub. Even a North Korean one although that's highly unlikely.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
No one knows if it was a US sub though.
There is no way to determine that simply based off sonar pings (unless you have a database of every known sub's signature and cross ref) of which no one claimed to have or done.
This could have been anyone's sub. Even a North Korean one although that's highly unlikely.
Saying it was nuclear is a pure assumption, it could have been diesel. In fact, being so easy to spot it probably was a diesel sub.
Originally posted by CranialSponge
reply to post by muzzleflash
This could have been anyone's sub. Even a North Korean one although that's highly unlikely.
I don't think they can paddle that far.
Lil' Kim isn't that little you know.
Originally posted by pavil
No offense to the Navy of Chile, but i seriously doubt any major powers nuclear subs would have been detected by them. You are talking top of the line subs against very average detection abilities. They would only be detected if they wanted to be detected.
Perhaps someone here with some Submarine or ASW experience could shed light on that.