It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD (Bureau of Legal Dentistry), a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes."
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Because its very old they will only ever be able to identify some of the DNA. The identifiable DNA will be human, then anything they cant properly identify they will claim is not human. With a statement like , "parts of the DNA could not be matched with anything human" or words to that effect.
Gotta keep the hoax train a-rolling
edit on 15-4-2013 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DaTroof
DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD (Bureau of Legal Dentistry), a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes."
From Wiki
It's been known for quite some time to be human.
Originally posted by engineer418
Dude, you could atleast use current data.
Originally posted by Ellie Sagan
reply to post by DPrice
Where's the proof it's a fake?
HooHaa
I've been following this skull for quite sometime.. I've seen all the data for
engineer418
reply to post by DaTroof
Does it now.
Does it also say its Terrestrial?
If I test a Chipanzee, how will it test? And, what level of testing is required to separate ne close secies frm another?
All y'all are basing your conclusion on incomplete data, and you think you are correct?!?
Ya might wanna take aother look.