It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by maus80
reply to post by Evanzsayz
bahahaha....oh. U.S. oil exports are up to 1.6 million barrels a day, but that has absolutely nothing to do with this thread.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I'm not trying to uproot you from your own beliefs, I just think that we need to be honest and look at this for what it is.
It's not American oil.
There's no guarantee it will be sold in America.
People that do not want the pipeline will lose land through imminent domain.
and
Transcanada gets to rake in the profits while the pipe runs right through the middle of our nation, just to be shipped elsewhere.
Is it just me that sees we may just be getting the short end of the stick?edit on 23-3-2013 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by neo96
Wow Amerikan energy "independence" ???????
Until China got involved it was deader than a doornail that Canadian oil is going to China.
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
Originally posted by maus80
reply to post by Evanzsayz
bahahaha....oh. U.S. oil exports are up to 1.6 million barrels a day, but that has absolutely nothing to do with this thread.
Actually it is since were talking about an oil pipeline to sustain americas demand on oil. Where did you hear we export that much oil per day...TV? Who in their right mind would export oil if they don't have a surplus? YOU CANT! Obviously you have no idea what your talking about...
It's like saying for the simple minded person like you...if my country produces 55 peanut butter sandwiches a day and their demand is 65...yet we give away 10 of those sandwiches to other countries it leaves us with -20. It makes so sense at all since we can't meet our demand...so whatever you heard youve been lied to buddy...dont believe everything you hear...go research it for yourself.edit on 24-3-2013 by Evanzsayz because: (no reason given)
Texas Gulf Coast refiners that would be the main recipients of Keystone-shipped crude already exported more than 60% of the gasoline they produced, 40% of their diesel output and 95% of their petroleum coke in 2012. It based its numbers on U.S. Census Bureau data. "These guys are already well into an export trend, and there's every reason to believe that will only increase" with Keystone, said Stephen Kretzman, the group's executive director.
Refiners agree figures show the Gulf area exports a lot of its output, but say that is no reason to shun Keystone XL. "The Gulf Coast is long on refining capacity and short on demand. Exports will continue with or without Keystone XL," said Bill Day, a spokesman for Valero VLO +0.50% Energy Corp., which just expanded its refinery in Port Arthur, Texas. "But exporting products is a good thing—it …increases the utilization rate, keeps refinery employees on the job and helps the trade deficit."
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by neo96
Wow Amerikan energy "independence" ???????
Until China got involved it was deader than a doornail that Canadian oil is going to China.
Actually no oil will be exported. It's tar sands oil which is dirty oil it costs more to refine into gas and diesel. This is what will be exported they will sell where they get the highest price. Where would you sell your gas where they sell by the gallon or by the liter?
You will call me a socialist but if the American taxpayers are paying for this pipeline then the oil should in the most part belong to the American people free of charge. Why should we pay for something only to turn around and be charged for it again? And there is no need for it to go to Texas there are plenty of refineries here in the Midwest that can refine the oil.
If the oil companies are making so much money they can pay for it.edit on 24-3-2013 by buster2010 because: (no reason given)edit on 24-3-2013 by buster2010 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by maus80
reply to post by buster2010
Thanks Buster, I guess my info was a few years outdated. What was my simple mind thinking?edit on 24-3-2013 by maus80 because: add txt
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by maus80
reply to post by buster2010
Thanks Buster, I guess my info was a few years outdated. What was my simple mind thinking?edit on 24-3-2013 by maus80 because: add txt
Yeah it's up to 2.4 million and these people are complaining we need more? If they can export so much then drop the price here by keeping some here. They could drop it to two dollars a gallon and still make a good profit. I see no reason to be greedy.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
The people who've said this will all be exported are absolutely right. The U.S. market will see whatever token amount they deem necessary to keep the worst criticism at bay and that, as they say, will be that. What took over half the night I spent on this was understanding WHY that's true. That, I need to take a bit of time to consider and think about how or if I really want to touch this one. I still can't find much for reference anywhere around for what I came across for connections..and I have to wonder why.
My main point for coming back though, is to say my first comments on here were made before I had all this reading and research done. I'm 180 degree from where I was and am 100% against their pipeline. It's not for the main reasons being talked about so far, either...but they can absolutely stick it.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by maus80
reply to post by buster2010
Thanks Buster, I guess my info was a few years outdated. What was my simple mind thinking?edit on 24-3-2013 by maus80 because: add txt
Yeah it's up to 2.4 million and these people are complaining we need more? If they can export so much then drop the price here by keeping some here. They could drop it to two dollars a gallon and still make a good profit. I see no reason to be greedy.
Prices will not drop.
From what I understand, oil production has increased under Obama but the prices never go down as supply go up.
That's why I find it funny that some believe this pipeline will help at the pump. Nothing ever changes the price of gas except for short supply and politics.
We are being screwed!
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by jacobe001
I have not dug into all of the funding aspects, but I believe this will be paid for with private funds.
No taxpayer money will be needed.
But there will be lots of tax-breaks given to Transcanada by state and local governments; forcing the taxpayer to cover any shortfalls.
Source
What is the Pipeline exactly?
The Keystone Pipeline already exists. What doesn’t is its proposed expansion, the Keystone XL Pipeline. The existing one runs from oil sand fields in Alberta, Canada into the U.S., ending in Cushing, Oklahoma.
The 1,700 new miles of pipeline would offer two sections of expansion. First, it would connect Cushing, Oklahoma, where there is a current bottleneck of oil, with the Gulf Coast of Texas, where oil refineries abound. Second, it would include a new section from Alberta to Kansas. It would pass through Bakken Shale region of eastern Montana and western North Dakota. Here, it will pass through a region where oil extraction is currently booming and take on some of this crude for transport.
Source
The requirement for reporting oil spills stems from the Discharge of Oil Regulation, known as the "sheen rule." Under this regulation, oil spill reporting does not depend on the specific amount of oil spilled, but on the presence of a visible sheen created by the spilled oil. Reporting an oil discharges may also be required under the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule. For more information on reporting oil discharges, please see: