It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by lasertaglover
Excellent points. And thanks for the support all.
Note also that we just had what appears to be a late aftershock in Haiti, too.
UPDATE: Quake came in at 5.1, was revised down to 5.0, and now it has been revised BACK UP to 5.1.
EDIT also: Depth revised to 8 km, which is still, even after review, WAY TOO SHALLOW for that spot.edit on Tue Feb 26th 2013 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)
And some people just don't get it, it seems. The rules have changed after Japan. There was a small swarm of quakes prior to the massive 9+. In researching the massive quake (biggest in history) 9.5 in Chile, there were foreshocks before it too. And in the OP here, we just saw the foreshocks with my mentioned thread about Santa Cruz Islands. Ample foreshocks before 8.0.
So no, don't listen anymore peoples to the BS that swarms can't lead to bigger quakes. It's not true. They CAN, they HAVE, and they WILL continue to, in a certain percentage of quakes. Will they here in this case? I DON'T KNOW!!!edit on Tue Feb 26th 2013 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thesmokingman
Earthquake swarms are NOT precursors to bigger quakes.
Originally posted by thesmokingman
These swarms actually let pressure escape
reply to post by _BoneZ_
TA has a proven track record showing that he knows what he's talking about. And he uses all available data.
Originally posted by IWant2Believe323
Okay enough is enough....
Mods please don't allow smokingman to continue to derail this thread. He can easily search TA's threads and posts to see what he's been right or wrong on without requesting it be spoon fed to him.
SMOKINGMAN: TA may not be right 100% of the time but his observations are spot on. He's been a valuable contributor in the Fragile Earth forum for years. Perhaps you can read the 700+ pages of the Yellowstone thread like I and so many others did. I'm not sure why you are being so rude, perhaps it's you're age, or you just had a bad day. But please stop and let those of us who want to hear TA's observations, do just that.
Originally posted by thesmokingman
Originally posted by IWant2Believe323
Okay enough is enough....
Mods please don't allow smokingman to continue to derail this thread. He can easily search TA's threads and posts to see what he's been right or wrong on without requesting it be spoon fed to him.
SMOKINGMAN: TA may not be right 100% of the time but his observations are spot on. He's been a valuable contributor in the Fragile Earth forum for years. Perhaps you can read the 700+ pages of the Yellowstone thread like I and so many others did. I'm not sure why you are being so rude, perhaps it's you're age, or you just had a bad day. But please stop and let those of us who want to hear TA's observations, do just that.
I have searched and find nothing. Thats why I asked for PROOF.