It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hefficide
In regard to the people who seem hell bent upon making these claims? I think I may have changed my mind about one aspect of all this... Based upon the debate skills I have seen presented here, perhaps some of you might actually be better off with this tactic in a court of law.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by ajay59
It is probably a good idea to let people think and act for themselves too,
So... you then just blow through intersections with stoplights and stop signs because you're somehow enlightened and don't need to bother with being told that some laws are a really good idea?
Got it.
Originally posted by ajay59
The facts are; nobody who has spoken in favor of the OPPT has in any way ever said, go and do this!
After exercising extreme prudence, the OPPT concluded that the corporations operating under the guise of the people’s government and financial systems were committing treason against the people of this planet without the people’s knowing, willing and intentional consent.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by vkey08
I therefore take the responsibility for starting it.
NO!
I won't let you have it!
I take responsibility for keeping it open.
Originally posted by Springer
reply to post by ajay59
The fact you can possibly say we are limiting discussion about a topic that now has over 75 pages tells everything it needs to. Well, to those who have the power of critical thought at least.
I'll assume that you meant to say (because I have a raging fever from the flu and am probably a little insane at the moment) that the fact we won't let the wholesale promotion of a total scam, that could end up hurting REAL PEOPLE in REAL LIFE, with limitless threads waxing sweetly about its virtues, makes it all to clear what our agenda is.
In that case, you're absolutely correct.
Springer...
Originally posted by ajay59
Discredit, ridicule and dismiss. HMMMMM...where have I seen this before.......?
Originally posted by ajay59
Originally posted by Springer
reply to post by ajay59
The fact you can possibly say we are limiting discussion about a topic that now has over 75 pages tells everything it needs to. Well, to those who have the power of critical thought at least.
I'll assume that you meant to say (because I have a raging fever from the flu and am probably a little insane at the moment) that the fact we won't let the wholesale promotion of a total scam, that could end up hurting REAL PEOPLE in REAL LIFE, with limitless threads waxing sweetly about its virtues, makes it all to clear what our agenda is.
In that case, you're absolutely correct.
Springer...
Is it not up to the people to decide if they want to take a chance that may or may not hurt them? Is it up to you or anyone else to decide for them? What do you ALL say? Do you want to delegate your right to protect yourself to these people?
When did offering a counter argument to anything equate with censorship?
Originally posted by ajay59
Discredit, ridicule and dismiss. HMMMMM...where have I seen this before.......?