It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jhill76
reply to post by windword
I do think that the God of the Old Testament was a liar.
Or, the OT speaks of how God is according to man.
Originally posted by Nightaudit
reply to post by windword
Even within the realm of theology this doesn´t make sense. God created the whole thing, he wouldn´t have created something he didn´t want to create.
You just said that god made a mistake, it doesn´t work that way.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by randyvs
Can I ID the perp? LOL
Perhaps the God of the OT is an imposter? Maybe much of the Bible was penned by the ruler of the world...........Dum dum dum dum..........SATAN?
Do you believe that the OT God is a made up character, with no reality to it. There was no burning bush or pillar of fire, or stone tablets and laws delivered by a deity?
[Yaldabaoth] became strong and created for himself other aeons with a flame of luminous fire which (still) exists now. And he joined with his madness which is in him and begot authorities for himself. The name of the first one is Athoth, whom the generations call [...]. The second one is Harmas, who [is the eye] of envy. The third one is Kalila-Oumbri. The fourth one is Yabel. The fifth one is Adonaiou, who is called Sabaoth. The sixth one is Cain, whom the generation of men call the sun. The seventh is Abel. the eighth is Abrisene. The ninth is Yobel. The tenth is Armoupieel. The eleventh is Malcheir-Adonein. The twelfth is Belias, who is over the depth of Hades.
This is only a single list of archons within the Apocryphon, and The Hypostasis of the Archons and On the Origin of the World (all found in the Nag Hammadi Codex), give a similar story and different archonic names, though Yaldabaoth remains more or less the same, only varying in his degrees of evil and insanity.
jeffreyskupperman.com...
There is nothing in either book that a person who had never seen or even heard of eather religious texts could not think of themselves.
Are you familiar with the Nag Hammadi gnostic creation texts that describes the evil demiurge and how this evil came to be in the physical world? I kinda agree with them.
How well it suits all men, on the subject of chaos, to say that it is a kind of darkness! But in fact it comes from a shadow, which has been called by the name 'darkness'. And the shadow comes from a product that has existed since the beginning. It is, moreover, clear that it existed before chaos came into being, and that the latter is posterior to the first product. Let us therefore concern ourselves with the facts of the matter; and furthermore, with the first product, from which chaos was projected.
After the natural structure of the immortal beings had completely developed out of the infinite, a likeness then emanated from Pistis (Faith); it is called Sophia (Wisdom). It exercised volition and became a product resembling the primeval light. And immediately her will manifested itself as a likeness of heaven, having an unimaginable magnitude; it was between the immortal beings and those things that came into being after them, like [...]: she (Sophia) functioned as a veil dividing mankind from the things above.
There is one thing that I cannot understand.
The Bible and the New Testament are vastly different and reflect the level of Man's development as well as changing religious text to suit the times.
Here's link that describes the myth.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by windword
You are an even bigger hypocrite than I am.
That's pretty bad Win. Sounds like a salad of Gnostic Pantheism with a few of your own cherries picked and tossed
in along the way. Then you even make reference to it being a myth ?
Here's link that describes the myth.
Is not this conspiracy perceived from a biased interpretation of only those sacred writings that have only to do with Christianity ?
edit on 10-1-2013 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by iwilliam
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by randyvs
Can I ID the perp? LOL
Perhaps the God of the OT is an imposter? Maybe much of the Bible was penned by the ruler of the world...........Dum dum dum dum..........SATAN?
Actually, throughout history there have been groups, including some early "Christian" groups who believed just that. If I'm not mistaken the original gnostics believed that the creator of this world (the old testament god) was not THE "ultimate" god... but rather an angry, jealous, kind of infantile minor-deity.
Some early and modern "fringe" groups also equate the figure of Christ with Lucifer.
"Christianity" is a very wide umbrella, with a range of beliefs far more varied than some realize.