It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
reply to post by Gridrebel
For the large corporations, it’s a win. This allows them to save thousands in medical insurance payments, gain an employee which creates competition and higher production from employees.
How is that a win? Larger employees won't save any costs. In fact, the larger, more profitable companies with a conscience for their employees will absorb some of the cost increases.
For the employee, either way it’s a loss
For employees that work 30 hours who are currently denied corporate benefits, this is a big win.
For all the other employees who were already covered and will see their paychecks will get smaller, this is a big loss.
Originally posted by Gridrebel
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
reply to post by Gridrebel
For the large corporations, it’s a win. This allows them to save thousands in medical insurance payments, gain an employee which creates competition and higher production from employees.
How is that a win? Larger employees won't save any costs. In fact, the larger, more profitable companies with a conscience for their employees will absorb some of the cost increases.
For the employee, either way it’s a loss
For employees that work 30 hours who are currently denied corporate benefits, this is a big win.
For all the other employees who were already covered and will see their paychecks will get smaller, this is a big loss.
It’s a win because they WILL save costs……medical premiums specifically. Many large companies DON’T have a conscience. Maybe they’ll absorb some of the costs for their more significant employees. The win is they gain employees. For employees that work 30 hours a week BECAUSE THE COMPANY DOESN’T WANT TO PAY MEDICAL PREMIUMS or other benefits on them – thus the 30 hours a week, they will now become employees that work 26, 27, 29 etc but less than 30 hours a week so they STILL remain benefit-less (is that a word?). And yes, ALLLLLLL the other employees will see smaller paychecks.
Originally posted by Ahabstar
All I saying is with a 1099 they will give people about 1.5 times their current hourly wage. People will accept that in a heartbeat. It costs the employer nothing additional and puts everything on the individual. After taxes (the full amount since the employer no longer covers half of it) and finding an insurance policy, the individual will net about 85% of what they make now...and they will be under legal contact to the employer for the length of the contact to supply that labor.
As a bonus to the business they can lower their accounting/payroll dept. And they can make money if the worker fails to provide the labor needed for breach of contract if they play hookie too many times.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
I fail to see how less mandated working hours are bad for Americans.
Originally posted by davjan4
The opposite can happen as well.
Sometimes we find things for people to do so they have enough hours because they need the health benefits. Keeping good people is worth it.
So now we don't have to find as much for them. 30 hours instead of 36.
I'm sure they will be thanking Obama for that.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
I fail to see how less mandated working hours are bad for Americans.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by xuenchen
Many employers cut peoples hours so as not to have to pay/provide benefits. Perhaps this law is intended to help people who find themselves in that situation?
For current employees that work 30 hours a week BECAUSE THE COMPANY DOESN’T WANT TO PAY MEDICAL PREMIUMS or other benefits on them – thus the 30 hours a week, they will become employees that work 26, 27, 29 etc but less than 30 hours a week so they STILL remain benefit-less (is that a word?).
If the employee meets the 30-hour threshold, they are counted as full-time for at least six months. If the employer has at least 50 such employees, he must provide them with health insurance or pay a fine.
Originally posted by xuenchen
“The term ‘full-time employee’ means, with respect to any month, an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week,” section 1513 of the law reads. (Scroll down to section 4, paragraph A.)
Originally posted by Blarneystoner
Originally posted by Dustytoad
Originally posted by AnIntellectualRedneck
2. Some corporations already offer benefits to workers working 32 hours per week, so it probably won't affect them that much.
This is what is confusing to me.. Everywhere I have ever worked has been 32 hours for full time. This new rule won't really change anything for me. Pretty sure it's state law here in NC.
What I'm not psyched about is having to get insurance. I can't afford insurance and I have never had insurance, so now I'll get to pay fines I can't afford either.. Sounds dumb.
edit on 10/22/2012 by Dustytoad because: (no reason given)
It might not be as bad as you think.
The company I work for just introduced us to the new health care plans offered.
I now have more choices. I have the option to choose the same PPO plan I'm currently on. Or I can opt into a plan where my health insurance premiums actually earn interest and dividends. Or I can choose another plan (Kelsey Siebold) where my medical care would be provided by one of 150 clinics in my area, with no referrals needed to see a specialist.
Three plans where only one was available previously and the two new plans are cheaper than the PPO.
In reality, the new Health Care program seems to be beneficial.... at least in my case.
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by xuenchen
“The term ‘full-time employee’ means, with respect to any month, an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week,” section 1513 of the law reads. (Scroll down to section 4, paragraph A.)
Please...think
Any employee...with respect to ANY MONTH...AVERAGE of at least 30 HOURS OF SERVICE per week.
SERVICE HOURS...
40 hours a week x 52 weeks per year = 2080 hours per year
Lunch?...ok 35 hours a week...(Service hours)...1820 hours per year
Holidays?... Vacation days?
The average 40 hour a week worker works about 30 "hours of Service" per week ON AVERAGE for a given month.