It is my observation that a reason for the push by the gay community and others for government to recognize their marriage is the benefits conferred
upon couples with married status. I understand there are other reasons as well, but for the purpose of this post I recognize this factor alone.
I draw this correlation:
When I served in the military, I knew several married couples who were married solely for the benefits they receive having married status. Benefits
such as separation pay, basic allowances for sustenance and quarters, and of course, a good reason to move out of the barracks. These couples dated
who they wanted, usually didn't live together, shared no financial responsiblity other than dividing their booty evenly... all in all, what they had
was a mutually beneficial situation exploited through the legality of marriage.
Rights I believe would be most important to recognize for gay couples are hospital visitation and shared caretaking, shared ownership of private
property and credit, and
possibly the receipt of social security survivor benefits (I'm afraid that may over-extend an already broken system).
But there are other benefits such as lowered car and home insurance and tax deductions that are also awarded married couples.
One question is, does anyone think there would be instances of men and women, who may, for instance, be declared singles and use the right for
homosexual marriage to receive benefits fraudulently, and would there require legislation to prevent or punish this? Could anyone actually be found
guilty of this?
Another question, does anyone think that the push for a Constitutional amendment have anything to do with the loss in revenue that the IRS and
insurance companies, among others, stand to endure?
Note: This is not the MUD PIT. No fighting. If you want to fight, I could maybe meet you in the MUD PIT after school. Or better yet, the debate
forum...
Thanks
Ike