'UFO' at the bottom of the Baltic Sea 'cuts off electrical equipment when divers get within 200m

reply to post by ATSZOMBIE


Nothing of late www.oceanexplorer.se...

reply to post by Zcustosmorum


Leave them alone. That simple.

I LOVE Aquaticterranians, just leave them alone and stop trying to kill them off through pollution and murder.

Originally posted by ATSZOMBIE
Was there any updates on this?!???

Sometimes answers ARE found in silence...

Good question

reply to post by Zcustosmorum


It seems they are trying the Greer method of crowd funding to finance their documentary ...1% achieved so far .
Geology isn't as interesting as invisible space ships

Maybe the news feed was cut off by the object.

reply to post by gortex

Geology isn't as interesting as invisible space ships

Even when you use that fancy name (geology) rocks just aren't nearly as exciting as a fantasy space ship.

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by gortex

 

Geology isn't as interesting as invisible space ships

Even when you use that fancy name (geology) rocks just aren't nearly as exciting as a fantasy space ship.

MARS rocks are but I hear you butcherguy

Originally posted by antar
reply to post by Zcustosmorum

 

Leave them alone. That simple.

I LOVE Aquaticterranians, just leave them alone and stop trying to kill them off through pollution and murder.

I googled that word, just to make sure it wasn't real.

Are they like mermaids?

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by Zcustosmorum

 

It seems they are trying the Greer method of crowd funding to finance their documentary ...1% achieved so far .
Geology isn't as interesting as invisible space ships

How about addressing the REAL issues instead of trying to discredit the subject with smear tactics? The two REAL issues are:
1. this team needs funds to carry out the comprehensive investigation people here accuse it of failing to do. There is nothing wrong in asking the general public for money (except, of course, to minds whose cynicism twists their judgement). Critics cannot have it both ways;
2. there is no satisfactory explanation of this anomaly that accounts for all the reported facts.

The team of divers have NEVER claimed that they had discovered a submerged space ship. It was just one of many possibilities they are considering. Passing off a sarcasm as though it were factual does not amount to a scientific argument. Instead, it's a dishonest tactic used by debunkers: misrepresenting people so as to be able to knock them down.

Originally posted by micpsi

2. there is no satisfactory explanation of this anomaly that accounts for all the reported facts.

How about... the reporting itself?

Baltic Sea update: Piece of the object is metal

reply to post by micpsi

How about addressing the REAL issues instead of trying to discredit the subject with smear tactics?

I already have in several of the many other threads on this formation of rocks .

The two REAL issues are:

No only one REAL issue , why do people believe what a bunch of treasure hunters say over experts in the field of geology ?
The fact is the Baltic region was Glacial for thousands of years , the rock formation is in all likelihood glacial in origin , no Millennium falcon , no mystery .

Here's the view of associate professor of geology at Stockholm University Volker Brüchert who analyzed the samples returned from the sea floor.

“I was surprised when I researched the material I found a great black stone that could be a volcanic rock. My hypothesis is that this object, this structure was formed during the Ice Age many thousands of years ago.”

And yet the skeptics team of Life’s Little Mysteries took it upon themselves to contact Brüchert to confirm his position, and were surely delighted to learn that the geologist is in fact convinced there is nothing mysterious or artificial about the Baltic Sea anomaly. His conclusion: that it is merely a deposit of volcanic material carried out by a glacier at the end of the last Ice Age.
mysteriousuniverse.org...

How's that for addressing the REAL issues

reply to post by butcherguy


VERY interesting that you picked up on that. They have been helping Surfers for ever.

No if it was a common occurrence we'd be seeing similar 'things' all over the baltic, and we're NOT. This is HIGHLY IRREGULAR and this professor like most skeptics, spews out a theory and everyone considers it case closed? Well sorrry it isn't.

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by micpsi

 

How about addressing the REAL issues instead of trying to discredit the subject with smear tactics?

I already have in several of the many other threads on this formation of rocks .

The two REAL issues are:

No only one REAL issue , why do people believe what a bunch of treasure hunters say over experts in the field of geology ?
The fact is the Baltic region was Glacial for thousands of years , the rock formation is in all likelihood glacial in origin , no Millennium falcon , no mystery .

Here's the view of associate professor of geology at Stockholm University Volker Brüchert who analyzed the samples returned from the sea floor.

“I was surprised when I researched the material I found a great black stone that could be a volcanic rock. My hypothesis is that this object, this structure was formed during the Ice Age many thousands of years ago.”

And yet the skeptics team of Life’s Little Mysteries took it upon themselves to contact Brüchert to confirm his position, and were surely delighted to learn that the geologist is in fact convinced there is nothing mysterious or artificial about the Baltic Sea anomaly. His conclusion: that it is merely a deposit of volcanic material carried out by a glacier at the end of the last Ice Age.
mysteriousuniverse.org...

How's that for addressing the REAL issues

edit on 3-7-2013 by gortex because: Edit to add

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by micpsi

 

How about addressing the REAL issues instead of trying to discredit the subject with smear tactics?

I already have in several of the many other threads on this formation of rocks .

I was referring to THIS thread. My point stands, despite your evasion.

The two REAL issues are:

No only one REAL issue , why do people believe what a bunch of treasure hunters say over experts in the field of geology ?

They don't. These treasure hunters are open to all theories. More misrepresentation by you.

The fact is the Baltic region was Glacial for thousands of years , the rock formation is in all likelihood glacial in origin , no Millennium falcon , no mystery .

Here's the view of associate professor of geology at Stockholm University Volker Brüchert who analyzed the samples returned from the sea floor.

“I was surprised when I researched the material I found a great black stone that could be a volcanic rock. My hypothesis is that this object, this structure was formed during the Ice Age many thousands of years ago.”

And yet the skeptics team of Life’s Little Mysteries took it upon themselves to contact Brüchert to confirm his position, and were surely delighted to learn that the geologist is in fact convinced there is nothing mysterious or artificial about the Baltic Sea anomaly. His conclusion: that it is merely a deposit of volcanic material carried out by a glacier at the end of the last Ice Age.
mysteriousuniverse.org...

How's that for addressing the REAL issues

Quoting just one man's OPINION is addressing the REAL issue? How about offering a theory that explains the anomalies (e.g., electrical equipment failure when diving over the anomaly)? That would be a start. Anyone can quote academic theories that dismally fail to address all the reported facts.

reply to post by micpsi

Quoting just one man's OPINION is addressing the REAL issue?

Regardless he's a specialist in the field plus he's examined samples from the dive site something neither you or I have done , if you want specifics ask him .

reply to post by ATSZOMBIE

No if it was a common occurrence we'd be seeing similar 'things' all over the baltic, and we're NOT.

The glacial history of the Baltic says there are probably many other examples of glacial erratic there , why would you expect to see them if no ones looking for them .

this professor like most skeptics, spews out a theory and everyone considers it case closed? Well sorrry it isn't.

And your theory on this anomaly is ?

Latest image of the Baltic Sea Anomaly

Sure looks like rock to me .

reply to post by Zcustosmorum


It's a good thing that analog cameras are still widely available.

sure doesn't to me.

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by micpsi

 

Quoting just one man's OPINION is addressing the REAL issue?

Regardless he's a specialist in the field plus he's examined samples from the dive site something neither you or I have done , if you want specifics ask him .

reply to post by ATSZOMBIE

 

No if it was a common occurrence we'd be seeing similar 'things' all over the baltic, and we're NOT.

The glacial history of the Baltic says there are probably many other examples of glacial erratic there , why would you expect to see them if no ones looking for them .

this professor like most skeptics, spews out a theory and everyone considers it case closed? Well sorrry it isn't.

And your theory on this anomaly is ?

Latest image of the Baltic Sea Anomaly

Sure looks like rock to me .

edit on 25-7-2013 by gortex because: Edit to add