It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Senate on Thursday rejected an amendment by Sen. Bernie Sanders to let states require clear labels on any food or beverage containing genetically engineered ingredients. The vote on the amendment to the farm bill was 26 to 73. "This is the very first time a bill on labeling genetically engineered food has been brought before the Senate. It was opposed by virtually every major food corporation in the country. While we wish we could have gotten more votes, this is a good step forward and something we are going to continue to work on. The people of Vermont and the people of America have a right to know what's in the food that they eat." Read more: www.thegic.org...
The AMA formal statement reads, in part: “Our AMA believes that as of June 2012, there is no scientific justification for special labeling of bioengineered foods, as a class, and that voluntary labeling is without value unless it is accompanied by focused consumer education.”
“The AMA’s rejection of mandatory labeling is consistent with the overwhelming majority of respected medical doctors, scientists and health experts that have concluded that foods made with the benefits of modern biotechnology are safe, and that labeling of these foods is unnecessary,” said Kathy Fairbanks, spokesperson for the Coalition Against the Costly Food Labeling Proposition.
There was concern among scientists at the FDA in the 1990s that genetically engineered foods could have new and different risks such as hidden allergens, increased plant-toxin levels and the potential to hasten the spread of antibiotic-resistant disease. Those concerns were largely brushed aside.
Today, unanswered questions remain. In the United States, resolutions calling for labeling of genetically engineered foods were passed by the American Public Health Association and the American Nurses Association.
In Canada, a landmark independent study by Canadian doctors published in the peer-reviewed journal Reproductive Toxicology found that toxin from soil bacterium engineered into corn to kill pests was present in the bloodstream of 93 percent of pregnant women.
There is a great need for additional research because there have never been mandatory human clinical trials of genetically engineered crops, no tests for carcinogenicity or harm to fetuses, no long-term testing for human health risks, no requirement for long-term testing on animals, and only limited allergy testing.
What this means is that, for all intents and purposes, the long-term health study of genetically engineered food is being done on all of the American people.
I realize you guys don't care but I DO.......as do millions of other people nation wide.
reply to post by snarky412
US Congress AND American Medical Association Votes No on Food Labeling
Originally posted by mysterioustranger
Youre mistaken to say we are not ALLOWED to know. Too lazy to find out maybe...certainly ALLOWED to.
Originally posted by ScatterBrain
reply to post by snarky412
US Congress AND American Medical Association Votes No on Food Labeling
People tend to avoid eating poison on purpose.
Originally posted by mysterioustranger
How is it that YOU say were not ALLOWED to know? I know. Ive eaten organic for 35 years. I know exactly whats in it. I can research it, look it up whatever. Its not hidden.
Anyone who care can look into what they put in themselves.
Youre mistaken to say we are not ALLOWED to know. Too lazy to find out maybe...certainly ALLOWED to.
Originally posted by mysterioustranger
How is it that YOU say were not ALLOWED to know? I know. Ive eaten organic for 35 years. I know exactly whats in it. I can research it, look it up whatever. Its not hidden.
Anyone who care can look into what they put in themselves.
Youre mistaken to say we are not ALLOWED to know. Too lazy to find out maybe...certainly ALLOWED to.